Interests and limits of the representation of individual variability in dynamic herd models
Abstract
The variability of individual responses is a key element to understand and evaluate herd performance. It has a biological basis(responses generated by physiological regulations and genotype) and a decisional basis (different management practices involving differentherd organisation levels). This review analyses if current dynamic herd models were appropriate to study individual variabilityand produce knowledge to benefit from it. After analysing the type of biological responses represented in models and how theseresponses are modelled and then the type of management practices and the herd levels involved to perform these practices, the conclusionpresents the models’ shortcomings to study individual variability. They emerge from a partial view of the biological basis (onlyone type of biological response represented, no response to feeding and no regulations) and of the decisional one (no individual information,a single type of practices and no link between farmer’s project, groups of animals and practices). As a result, simulating theemergence of individual variability from herd operation requires developing agent-based herd model with two essential characteristics:first, representing the animal as a regulated organism in a nutritional environment and second, formalizing groups of animalsas management entities, targeted by a set of feeding, reproductive and replacement practices.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 737
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- M. TICHIT , S. INGRAND , C.H. MOULIN , S. COURNUT , J. LASSEUR , B. DEDIEU , Analysis of the diversity of breeding female productive trajectories : interest for modelling the functioning of suckling herds , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 17 No. 2 (2004)
- N.C. FRIGGENS, D. SAUVANT, O. MARTIN, Towards operational definitions of robustness that rely on biology : nutrition , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010): Dossier :Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience,... les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d’élevage
- J.P. DULPHY, J. ROUEL, M. JAILLER, D. SAUVANT, Additional data on mastication time in dairy cows fed forage-rich diet : influence of the forage type and concentrate supplementation level , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 6 No. 4 (1993)
- D. SAUVANT, Nutritional and zootechnical consequences of variations in starch degradation rate in ruminants , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 10 No. 4 (1997)
- D. SAUVANT, J. VAN MILGEN, Consequences of kinetics of ruminal degradation on ruminal metabolism and zootechnical performances , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 8 No. 5 (1995)
- C. ASSOUMAYA, D. SAUVANT, H. ARCHIMEDE, Comparative study of intake and digestion of tropical and temperate forages , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 20 No. 5 (2007)
- F. MESCHY, D. SAUVANT, P. PINOT, only in French , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 18 No. 3 (2005): Numéro spécial : Le phosphore dans l’alimentation animale
- D. SAUVANT, only in French , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 14 No. 5 (2001): Numéro Spécial: Matières grasses alimentaires et qualité des produits
- B. MICHALET-DOREAU, D. SAUVANT, Influence of nature of concentrate, cereals or beet pulp, on ruminants digestion , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 2 No. 4 (1989)
- D. SAUVANT, (only in French) Alimentation des vaches laitières : Que penser des normes étrangères ? , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 5 No. 4 (1992)
