Interests and limits of the representation of individual variability in dynamic herd models
Abstract
The variability of individual responses is a key element to understand and evaluate herd performance. It has a biological basis(responses generated by physiological regulations and genotype) and a decisional basis (different management practices involving differentherd organisation levels). This review analyses if current dynamic herd models were appropriate to study individual variabilityand produce knowledge to benefit from it. After analysing the type of biological responses represented in models and how theseresponses are modelled and then the type of management practices and the herd levels involved to perform these practices, the conclusionpresents the models’ shortcomings to study individual variability. They emerge from a partial view of the biological basis (onlyone type of biological response represented, no response to feeding and no regulations) and of the decisional one (no individual information,a single type of practices and no link between farmer’s project, groups of animals and practices). As a result, simulating theemergence of individual variability from herd operation requires developing agent-based herd model with two essential characteristics:first, representing the animal as a regulated organism in a nutritional environment and second, formalizing groups of animalsas management entities, targeted by a set of feeding, reproductive and replacement practices.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 737
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- H. ARCHIMÈDE, D. BASTIANELLI, M. BOVAL, G. TRAN, D. SAUVANT, Tropical resources : availability and feed value , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 24 No. 1 (2011): Numéro spécial : Élevages en régions chaudes
- P. SCHMIDELY, D. SAUVANT, Fat content yield and composition of milk in small ruminants : effects of concentrate level and addition of fat , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 14 No. 5 (2001): Numéro Spécial: Matières grasses alimentaires et qualité des produits
- D. SAUVANT , G. CANTALAPIEDRA-HIJAR , L. DELABY , J.B. DANIEL , P. FAVERDIN , P. NOZIÈRE , Updating protein requirements in ruminants and determination of the responses of lactating females to metabolisable protein supply , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 28 No. 5 (2015)
- M. TAGHIPOOR, Sophie LEMOSQUET, J. VAN MILGEN, A. SIEGEL, D. SAUVANT, F. GONDRET, Modelling of metabolic flexibility: toward a better understanding of animal adaptive capacities , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016)
- J.M. PEREZ , G. BORIES , A. AUMAITRE , B. BARRIER-GUILLOT, A. DELAVEAU , L. GUEGUEN , M. LARBIER , D. SAUVANT , Consequences of the replacement of meat and bone meals and fats of animal origin on farm animals and for human consumers , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2002)
- D. SAUVANT, Nutritional influences of granulometry of ruminant diet , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2000): Numéro Spécial : Granulométrie des aliments
- D. SAUVANT, F. MESCHY, D. MERTENS, Les composantes de l’acidose ruminale et les effets acidogènes des rations , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 12 No. 1 (1999)
- D. SAUVANT , J.L. PEYRAUD , Diet formulation and evaluation of the risk of acidosis , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 4 (2010)
- D. SAUVANT, S. GIGER-REVERDIN, F. MESCHY, The control of latent ruminal acidosis , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 19 No. 2 (2006)
- M. THOMAS, L. FORTUN-LAMOTHE, M. JOUVEN, M. TICHIT, E. GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA, J.Y. DOURMAD, B. DUMONT, Agroecology and industrial ecology: two complementary alternatives for animal production in the 21st century , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 27 No. 2 (2014): Numéro spécial : Quelles innovations pour quels systèmes d'élevage ?
