Interests and limits of the representation of individual variability in dynamic herd models
Abstract
The variability of individual responses is a key element to understand and evaluate herd performance. It has a biological basis(responses generated by physiological regulations and genotype) and a decisional basis (different management practices involving differentherd organisation levels). This review analyses if current dynamic herd models were appropriate to study individual variabilityand produce knowledge to benefit from it. After analysing the type of biological responses represented in models and how theseresponses are modelled and then the type of management practices and the herd levels involved to perform these practices, the conclusionpresents the models’ shortcomings to study individual variability. They emerge from a partial view of the biological basis (onlyone type of biological response represented, no response to feeding and no regulations) and of the decisional one (no individual information,a single type of practices and no link between farmer’s project, groups of animals and practices). As a result, simulating theemergence of individual variability from herd operation requires developing agent-based herd model with two essential characteristics:first, representing the animal as a regulated organism in a nutritional environment and second, formalizing groups of animalsas management entities, targeted by a set of feeding, reproductive and replacement practices.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 737
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- S. GIGER-REVERDIN, J. AUFRERE, D. SAUVANT, C. DEMARQUILLY, M. VERMOREL, S. POCHET, Prediction of net energy value of compound feeds for ruminants , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 3 No. 3 (1990)
- D. SAUVANT, P. NOZIÈRE, The quantification of the main digestive processes in ruminants: the equations involved in the renewed energy and protein feed evaluation systems , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 26 No. 4 (2013)
- D. SAUVANT, S. GIGER-REVERDIN, F. MESCHY, L. PUILLET, P. SCHMIDELY, Updating nutritional recommendations for dairy goats , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012): Dossier : Élevage caprin
- D. SAUVANT, J.P. DULPHY, B. MICHALET-DOREAU, The fibrosity index of ruminant feed and diet , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 3 No. 5 (1990)
- P. CHAPOUTOT, M. DORLEANS , D. SAUVANT, Study of rumen degradation kinetics of cell wall components of concentrate feeds and agroindustrial by-products , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2010)
- M. BOVAL, N. EDOUARD, M. NAVES, D. SAUVANT, Feed efficiency and performance of cattle grazing tropical grasslands: a meta-analysis , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 28 No. 4 (2015)
- F. MESCHY , D. BRAVO , D. SAUVANT , Meta analysis of responses of lactating cows to buffer supplementation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2004)
- P. BAS, D. SAUVANT, Variation of lipid composition of adipose tissues and muscles in cattle , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 14 No. 5 (2001): Numéro Spécial: Matières grasses alimentaires et qualité des produits
- N.C. FRIGGENS, O. MARTIN, L. BRUN-LAFLEUR, D. SAUVANT, P. FAVERDIN, Nutrient partitioning between physiological functions in the dairy cow depends on the genotype and its expression through time , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 26 No. 2 (2013): Numéro spécial : La vache et le lait
- L. PUILLET, M. TICHIT, O. MARTIN, D. SAUVANT, A model of the herd functioning to assess the milk production and the feed efficiency in dairy goat systems , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012): Dossier : Élevage caprin
