Extensification of grassland in sheep farming in a mountainous region. Results of a 5-year survey in the northern Massif Central region of France
Abstract
The European Union encourages the extensification of grassland on beef and sheep farms to better master production and to avoid reduced land use. Good conditions, however, are necessary to realise extensification in order to maintain a flock’s productivity and particularly its economical results, while maintaining control of the natural vegetation.
A long term trial (5 years) was undertaken on an INRA experimental farm located in unfavourised area (800 m altitude). On the farm, two identical sheep flocks were managed with a 30% stocking rate (cattle equivalent/ha) difference. The experimental procedures were adapted every year to achieve optimum grass utilisation under both systems. Extensification did not reduce the ewes’ performance and it improved the lambs’ carcass weight by 6% in spite of a 26% reduction in the consumption of concentrate and a 50% decrease in grass production cost per ewe.
The economical balance, over the whole experimental period, favoured the extensive system. The overall gross margin surplus, 3/4 of which was due to input reduction, was sufficient to cover the structural changes induced by extension. The extensive system results were, however, more irregular and required better long-term planning over several years, particularly for resource management and for stock carry-over. The technical skill required is at least equal to that required for intensive production. This experiment represented a potential means for improving farming methods. Nevertheless, this potential will not be attained unless the farmers receive technical and economic support for the extensive systems such as the "grass subsidy" that was established in France in 1993.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 684
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- M. BENOIT, A tool for simulation of sheep flock functioning, with it’s economic results : an help for adaptation to new contexts , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998)
- G. LIÉNARD, D. BÉBIN, M. LHERM, P. VEYSSET, Forage harvesting methods and beef production systems in the Charolais area , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 5 (1998)
- P. CORDONNIER , M. JOURNET, Y. CHILLIARD, G. LIENARD, (only in French) Impact économique de l’utilisation de la somatotropine dans les systèmes laitiers français , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 2 No. 5 (1989)
- S. PRACHE, M. THERIEZ, Lamb production at pasture , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1988)
- M. BENOIT, G. LAIGNEL, G. LIÉNARD, Should sheep farmers in the Montmorillonnais area (Vienne, France), choose intensification or should they opt for more extensive methods ? Observations to fuel a debate , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 4 No. 5 (1991)
- G. LIENARD, M. LHERM, D. BEBIN, Beef production from suckling cow farms in defavourised zones : evolution and questions , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 9 No. 4 (1996)
- M. BENOIT, A. BRELURUT, Deer (Cervus Elaphus) farming in the west of France : technical and economical results , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 9 No. 2 (1996)
- M. LHERM, D. BÉBIN, G. LIÉNARD, Effect of the reform of the CAP on suckling cows farms in Central Charolais , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 7 No. 5 (1994)
- C. MIGNOLET, M. BENOIT, D. SAINTOT, Livestock farming systems and nitrate pollution risk. Construction of a risk indicator and application on the Vosges plain , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 10 No. 4 (1997)
- M. THERIEZ, Consequences of prolificacy on lambs rearing and on meat production , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 4 No. 2 (1991)
