Tools for decreasing enteric methane production by ruminants
Abstract
This paper reviews the strategies to reduce methanogenesis in ruminants and their applicability on farm. It is known that increasingthe percentage of concentrate decreases the production of methane per kg of dry matter intake. This effect is especially important athigh levels of concentrate. Cereals decrease more methane emission than concentrates rich in fibre. Lipid inclusion in diets significantlydecreases methane emission. Among forages, maize silage diets result in lower emissions than hay or grass silage diets, butdifferences in vegetation stages or between grasses and legumes are low and sometimes controversial. Alarge number of plant extractsand additives with different modes of action have been assayed. Plants rich in tannins or tannin extracts result in methane mitigation,but the risk of impairing diet digestibility has to be considered. The long term efficacy of many of these additives still needs tobe evaluated. Biotechnologies that reduce dihydrogen available for methanogenesis are promising but need further testing. Increasingthe level of production of animals results in a decrease in methane production, which is especially significant when methane isexpressed per kg of milk or meat. There are also differences between animals in their global productive efficiency, evaluated throughthe residual feed intake. The most efficient animals produce less methane per kg of milk or meat. This paper stresses the need to lookbeyond enteric methane mitigation, and to evaluate the efficacy of mitigation strategies on all greenhouse gases associated to ruminantproduction.
Attachments
No supporting information for this articleArticle statistics
Views: 2954
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- P. MORAND-FEHR, M. DOREAU , Effects of heat stress on feed intake and digestion in ruminants , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2001)
- M. DOREAU, V. FIEVEZ, A. TROEGELER-MEYNADIER, F. GLASSER, Ruminal metabolism and digestion of long chain fatty acids in ruminants: recent advances in knowledge , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 4 (2012)
- V. BLANFORT, M. DOREAU, J. HUGUENIN, J. LAZARD, V. PORPHYRE, J.F. SOUSSANA, B. TOUTAIN, Livestock environmental impacts and services in warm regions , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 24 No. 1 (2011): Numéro spécial : Élevages en régions chaudes
- M. DOREAU, Mare milk , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991)
- M. DOREAU, Y. CHILLIARD, Fat supplementation of dairy rations and its consequences on milk quality in dairy cows , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 5 No. 2 (1992)
- M. DOREAU , P. GRIMAUD , B. MICHALET-DOREAU, The effects of underfeeding on digestion in ruminants , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 13 No. 4 (2000)
- F. CALENGE, C. MARTIN, N. LE FLOCH, F. PHOCAS, D. MORGAVI, C. ROGEL-GAILLARD, P. QUÉRÉ, Integrating the characterization of digestive microbiota in phenotyping livestock animals: towards a new tool for animal health control? , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 27 No. 3 (2014): Dossier : Phénotypage des animaux d'élevage
- J.F. HOCQUETTE, H. BOUDRA, I. CASSAR-MALEK, C. LEROUX, I. PICARD, I. SAVARY-AUZELOUX, L. BERNARD, A. CORNU, D. DURAND, A. FERLAY, D. GRUFFAT, D.P. MORGAVI, C. TERLOUW, Perspectives offertes par les approches en « omique » pour l’amélioration de la durabilité de l’élevage des herbivores , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 22 No. 5 (2009)
- A. LETTAT, C. MARTIN, C. BERGER, P. NOZIÈRE, Analyse quantitative de l’effet des bactéries probiotiques sur les fermentations dans le rumen et les performances des bovins en production , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 4 (2012)
- M. DOREAU, R. BAUMONT, J.M. PEREZ, Foreword , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 24 No. 5 (2011): Dossier : Gaz à effet de serre en élevage bovin : le méthane
