Byproducts from the agro-food industries: quality feedstuffs not to be neglected
Abstract
For decades, agro-food chains have been producing either first or second transformation byproducts, which represent in France a significant amount of resources (12 million tons of dry matter, Réséda 2007). These byproducts come mainly from the crushing sector (29 %), sugar refinery (14 %) and starch industry (13 %). Most of these resources (75 %) are used in animal feeding, including about 80 % via the compound feed industry and 20 % directly on the farms. Hence, agro-industrial by-products, which are clearly defined as non-waste products by French and European regulations, have become raw materials used in animal feed and must therefore comply with the regulations applicable to such products. The availability of these byproducts can vary considerably over time with a marked seasonality for certain sectors, as well as spatially according to the distribution of agro-food factories on the territory and the overlap with the animal production areas. The technological processes generating these byproducts can differ from one sector to another. Botanical and chemical composition of byproducts depend on the process implemented, which can evolve over time but also from one factory to another within the same agro-industry sector. Making the most of these byproducts in animal feeding is largely conditioned by the precise knowledge of the quality of the various organic (essentially cell walls and proteins) or mineral fractions accumulated in the byproducts, and of their utilization efficiency which can change strongly according to the animal species (ruminants vs monogastrics) and according to the types of processes applied. Some feeding recommendations and sanitary rules must be enforced to ensure an optimal utilization of byproducts by the animals without decreasing their performances. Therefore, these byproducts have a real economic value that can be determined, even for ruminants, using the low-cost linear programming formulation tools commonly used for monogastrics.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 49536
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Sarah LAISSE, René BAUMONT, Léonie DUSART, Didier GAUDRÉ, Benoit ROUILLÉ, Marc BENOIT, Patrick VEYSSET, Didier RÉMOND, Jean-Louis PEYRAUD, The net feed conversion efficiency of livestock: a new approach to assess the contribution of livestock to human feeding , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018): Volume 31: Issue3: Dossier: Feed resources for livestock
- Gaëlle MAXIN, Pierre NOZIÈRE, Daniel SAUVANT, René BAUMONT, Application of multi-criteria evaluation methods to ruminant diets: identification of criteria to be evaluated and indicators to be measured on feeds , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018): Volume 31: Issue3: Dossier: Feed resources for livestock
- René BAUMONT, Virginie DECRUYENAERE, Gaëlle MAXIN, Benoît ROUILLÉ, Valérie HEUZÉ, Gilles TRAN, Valorising a diversity of biomasses to meet the technical, environmental and societal challenges of ruminant farming , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 36 No. 1 (2023)
- Daniel SAUVANT, Laurence PUILLET, Bertrand BLUET, Spatio-temporal extension of the INRA 2018 goat model. 2. Dynamic changes of body reserves, body weight and body condition score throughout a whole productive cycle , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 35 No. 1 (2022)
- Pierre NOZIÈRE, Solveig MENDOWSKI, Anne FERLAY, Corinne PEYRONNET, Francis ENJALBERT, Guillaume CHESNEAU, Antoine GERMAIN, Patrick CHAPOUTOT, Towards protein autonomy for feeding ruminants - the Proleval project , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 35 No. 2 (2022)
- Daniel SAUVANT, Modeling efficiency and robustness in ruminants, the nutritional point of view , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 33 No. 1 (2020)
- Daniel SAUVANT, Patrick CHAPOUTOT, Sylvie GIGER-REVERDIN, Bertrand BLUET, Spatio-temporal extension of the INRA 2018 goat model: 1. application to group feeding , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021)
