Greenhouse gases in cattle breeding : evaluation and mitigation strategies
Abstract
In today's environmental context, as much political (the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions) as social (consumer demands forinformation concerning food products), there is a need to determine the influence of ruminant livestock on climate change. It hasbecome crucial to quantify precisely the levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and carbon sequestration for different ruminantlivestock systems by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the carbon footprint of dairy and beef farms. This approachallows us to account for GHG in relation with direct and indirect emissions. Thus in the French dairy system, the average grosscarbon footprint is 1.26 kg CO2 /kg milk. Carbon sequestration under grassland and hedges compensates for GHG emissions rangingfrom 6 to 43% according to the system utilized. Consequently the net carbon footprint is 1.0 kg CO2 / kg milk. In the Frenchbeef system, the gross carbon footprint for raw materials is comprised between 14.8 and 16.5 kg CO2 / kg of live meat depending onthe production system. It must be mentioned that carbon sequestration represents compensation in a range of 24 to 53% and the netcarbon footprint is between 7.9 and 11.3 kg CO2 / kg of live meat. These investigations demonstrate that numerous mitigation actionshave been identified in the livestock systems to reduce the carbon footprint of milk and meat at the farm gate. Some of them concernmanagement practices (adjustment of dietary intake, fertilization management…) which result in substantial savings in agriculturalexpenses. Others require the installation of new technologies which would require additional funds to improve the productionprocesses.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 8297
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- P. FAVERDIN, L. DELABY, R. DELAGARDE, The feed intake in dairy cows and its prediction during lactation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2007): Dossier : Alimentation des ruminants
- M. PETIT, J. AGABRIEL, P. D’HOUR, J.P. GAREL, A few features of suckler hardy breeds , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 7 No. 4 (1994)
- M. LHERM, J. AGABRIEL, J. DEVUN, Status and trends of suckler beef production in France and in three European countries , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 30 No. 2 (2017): Volume 30 Issue 2 : Dossier: Suckling cattle farming
- D. SAUVANT , G. CANTALAPIEDRA-HIJAR , L. DELABY , J.B. DANIEL , P. FAVERDIN , P. NOZIÈRE , Updating protein requirements in ruminants and determination of the responses of lactating females to metabolisable protein supply , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 28 No. 5 (2015)
- F. BLANC , B. DUMONT , G. BRUNSCHWIG , F. BOCQUIER , J. AGABRIEL , Extensive ruminant farming systems highlight animal coping processes based on robustness, flexibility and plasticity , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 1 (2010): Dossier :Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience,... les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d’élevage
- H. RULQUIN, C. HURTAUD, S. LEMOSQUET, J.L. PEYRAUD, Quantification of the effects of energetic nutrients on fat content of cow milk , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2007): Dossier : Alimentation des ruminants
- R. BAUMONT, P. CHAMPCIAUX, J. AGABRIEL, J. ANDRIEU, J. AUFRÈRE, B. MICHALET-DOREAU, C. DEMARQUILLY, An integrated tool to predict feed value for ruminants : PrévAlim for INRAtion , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 12 No. 3 (1999)
- D. SAUVANT , J.L. PEYRAUD , Diet formulation and evaluation of the risk of acidosis , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 4 (2010)
- M. PETIT, J. AGABRIEL, Body reserves of Charolais cow. Relations with reproductive performance , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 6 No. 5 (1993)
- A. BOUDON, H. KHELIL-ARFA, J.L. MÉNARD, P. BRUNSCHWIG, P. FAVERDIN, Watering requirements of dairy herds: physiological determinisms and quantification , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2013)
