Greenhouse gases in cattle breeding : evaluation and mitigation strategies
Abstract
In today's environmental context, as much political (the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions) as social (consumer demands forinformation concerning food products), there is a need to determine the influence of ruminant livestock on climate change. It hasbecome crucial to quantify precisely the levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and carbon sequestration for different ruminantlivestock systems by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the carbon footprint of dairy and beef farms. This approachallows us to account for GHG in relation with direct and indirect emissions. Thus in the French dairy system, the average grosscarbon footprint is 1.26 kg CO2 /kg milk. Carbon sequestration under grassland and hedges compensates for GHG emissions rangingfrom 6 to 43% according to the system utilized. Consequently the net carbon footprint is 1.0 kg CO2 / kg milk. In the Frenchbeef system, the gross carbon footprint for raw materials is comprised between 14.8 and 16.5 kg CO2 / kg of live meat depending onthe production system. It must be mentioned that carbon sequestration represents compensation in a range of 24 to 53% and the netcarbon footprint is between 7.9 and 11.3 kg CO2 / kg of live meat. These investigations demonstrate that numerous mitigation actionshave been identified in the livestock systems to reduce the carbon footprint of milk and meat at the farm gate. Some of them concernmanagement practices (adjustment of dietary intake, fertilization management…) which result in substantial savings in agriculturalexpenses. Others require the installation of new technologies which would require additional funds to improve the productionprocesses.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 8297
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- R. DUMONT, M. ROUX, C. TOURAILLE, J. AGABRIEL, D. MICOL, D. CONTOUR, M.C. BAYLE, The fattening of cull Charolais cows : effect of linseed meal on fattening performance and meat quality , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 10 No. 2 (1997)
- M.O. NOZIERES , J.P. DULPHY , J.L. PEYRAUD , C. PONCET , R. BAUMONT, Forage protein value. New estimation of the rumen protein degradability and of the true digestibility of dietary protein in the small intestine, and consequences on the PDI values , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2007): Dossier : Alimentation des ruminants
- P. FAVERDIN , D. M’HAMED , M. RICO-GÓMEZ, R. VERITE , Protein nutrition affects feed intake in dairy cows , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 16 No. 1 (2003)
- R. DUMONT , M. ROUX , J. AGABRIEL , C. TOURAILLE , J. BONNEMAIRE , C. MALTERRE , J. ROBELIN , The fattening of Charolais cull cows , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 4 No. 4 (1991)
- C. MALTERRE, J. ROBELIN, J. AGABRIEL, P. BORDES, The fattening of Limousine cull cows , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 2 No. 5 (1989)
- J.L. PEYRAUD, L. DELABY, Combining the optimal management of grazing and the performances of dairy cows : issue and tools , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 18 No. 4 (2005)
- L. DELABY, J.L. PEYRAUD, R. DELAGARDE, Is it necessary to supplement dairy cows at grazing ? , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 16 No. 3 (2003)
- J.B. COULON, P. FAVERDIN, F. LAURENT, G. COTTO, Influence of the type of concentrate on dairy production , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 2 No. 1 (1989)
- J.L. PEYRAUD, F. PHOCAS, Foreword " Livestock phenotyping" , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 27 No. 3 (2014): Dossier : Phénotypage des animaux d'élevage
- J. AGABRIEL, N. GRENET, M. PETIT, The relationship between body condition and the inter calving period in milking cow - a two year study , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 5 No. 5 (1992)
