Variability in pig units: description and on-farm implication
Abstract
Pig breeders can cope with variation in sow prolificacy as long as the total number of piglets born alive does not exceed the total number of functional teats of the sows in the farrowing unit. Cross-fostering allows adjusting the size of the litter to the milk production potential of the sow. When prolificacy increases, this objective becomes more difficult to achieve. In addition, the within-litter variation of birth weight increases with prolificacy, compromising the survival chance of small piglets. Short-term solutions can be obtained by providing additional care around birth, by grouping of pigs of similar body weight and by providing appropriate feeding strategies. Nevertheless, variability is still observed at the end of the fattening period. This results in difficulties to find the best slaughtering strategy, especially when the economic return depends on a payment grid that is based partly on carcass weight. Although genetic selection may eventually reduce the variation in performance in sows and piglets, feeding strategies that account for the individual requirement of the gestating sow can already be used to improve the farrowing process. Although this helps to improve piglet vitality at birth, to date, it is not effective in reducing within-litter variation in birth weight. Most of these improvements have been reported for sows and piglets kept in experimental facilities. It remains a challenge to obtain these results in production units.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 1059
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- J.Y. DOURMAD, M. ÉTIENNE, J. NOBLET, (only in French) Alimentation et gestion des réserves corporelles de la truie : conséquences sur sa longévité , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998)
- H. QUESNEL, A. PRUNIER, L’ovulation après le tarissement des truies : mécanismes physiologiques et facteurs de variation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 8 No. 3 (1995)
- M. GLOAGUEN, N. LE FLOC’H, J. VAN MILGEN, Update on amino acid requirements for piglets fed with low crude protein diets , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2013)
- M. BONNEAU , F. BELINE , J.Y. DOURMAD , M. HASSOUNA , C. JONDREVILLE , L. LOYON, T. MORVAN , J.M. PAILLAT , Y. RAMONET , P. ROBIN , Elements of waste from pigs : knowledge and control , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008): Numéro spécial : Porcherie verte
- C. LARZUL , F. GONDRET , Genetics of growth traits and meat quality in the rabbit , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 18 No. 2 (2005)
- L. MONTAGNE, J.Y. DOURMAD, Foreword , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2009): Dossier : Les nouveaux enjeux de la nutrition et de l’alimentation du porc
- H. QUESNEL, Metabolic status and reproduction in the lactating sow , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 18 No. 4 (2005)
- L. BROSSARD, N. QUINIOU, J.Y. DOURMAD, J. VAN MILGEN, Accounting for individual variability in modelling the response of pigs to the nutrient supply , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 1 (2012)
- D. SAUVANT, J. VAN MILGEN, Consequences of kinetics of ruminal degradation on ruminal metabolism and zootechnical performances , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 8 No. 5 (1995)
- N. QUINIOU, J.Y. DOURMAD, J. NOBLET, (only in French) Facteurs de variation de l’appétit des truies en lactation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998)
