Which animal breeding programs for agro-ecological livestock farming systems?
Abstract
Agroecology uses natural processes and local resources rather than chemical inputs to ensure production while limiting the environmental footprint of agriculture. In this context, breeding innovations are necessary to obtain animals that are both productive and adapted to a broad range of local contexts. Whatever the animal sector, reorienting current breeding programmes seems to be more useful than developing programmes dedicated to agroecological systems that will struggle to be really effective in terms of costs and expected genetic progress. Breeding for robustness aims to promote individual adaptive capacities by considering various selection criteria including reproduction, health, and adaptation to rough feed resources, warm climate or fluctuating environmental conditions. It leads considering genotype-environment interactions in the prediction of breeding values. Animal performance should be evaluated in low-input systems in order to select those animals adapted to limiting conditions. Standardization of both animals and breeding conditions appears contradictory to the agroecological paradigm that calls for an adaptation of animals to local opportunities and constraints in weakly artificialized systems tied to their physical environment. There is thus not a single agroecological animal type, but animals with various profiles that meet the expectations of agroecology. As well as supporting the value of within-breed diversity, we must preserve between-breed diversity to maintain numerous options for adaptation to a variety of production environments and contexts. This may involve to phenotypically and genetically characterize local breeds. Last but not least, improved assimilation by farmers and farm technicians of available genetic resources and breeding tools is necessary.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 2959
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- A. HODEN, C. HURTAUD, B. MARQUIS, L. DELABY, The use of a combined wheat or beet pulp and maize silage diet in dairy cattle , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 3 No. 4 (1990)
- L. CANARIO, S. MIGNON-GRASTEAU, M. DUPONT-NIVET, F. PHOCAS, Genetics of behavioural adaptation of livestock to farming conditions: the case of cattle, pig, poultry and fish productions , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 26 No. 1 (2013)
- P. VELGE , I. VIRLOGEUX-PAYANT, A.C. LALMANACH, C. BELLOC , P. FRAVALO , A. VIGNAL , C. BEAUMONT, Decrease the prevalence of Salmonella carrier state in animals : a multidisciplinary approach , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 21 No. 1 (2008): Numéro spécial "20 ans de recherches en productions animales à l’INRA"
- A. BOUQUET , G. RENAND , F. PHOCAS , Evolution of the genetic diversity of French beef cattle populations from 1979 to 2008 , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 22 No. 4 (2009)
- A. HODEN, B. MARQUIS, L. DELABY, Fodder beets with maize and red clover silages for dairy cows , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 1 No. 3 (1988)
- B. DUMONT, Dietary choice determinism for grazing herbivores : principal theories , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 8 No. 4 (1995)
- M. TIXIER-BOICHARD, (only in French) L’amélioration génétique en France : le contexte et les acteurs - Les Volailles , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 5 No. HS (1992): Hors série 1992- Eléments de génétique quantitative et application aux populations animales
