Agroecology and industrial ecology: two complementary alternatives for animal production in the 21st century
Abstract
Agroecology and industrial ecology can be viewed as complementary means for the design of sustainable animal farming systems: agroecology by stimulating natural processes to reduce inputs, and using diversity to increase system resilience and provide ecosystem services. Industrial ecology mainly aims to close system loops within a territory, thereby reducing demand for raw materials and lowering pollution. Animal farming systems have so far been ignored in most agroecological thinking. We propose five principles applicable to animal production systems: i) adopting health management practices that minimize the use of chemical drugs, ii) decreasing the inputs needed for production by using grazing lands and by-products, iii) decreasing pollution by optimizing the functioning of farming systems, iv) enhancing diversity within animal production systems to strengthen their resilience, and v) preserving biological diversity and associated ecosystem services by adapting management practices. Based on four case studies, we show how these different principles can be combined to improve economic and environmental performance. We discuss opportunities and resistance to change what needs to be considered for the scaling-up of agroecological systems. Among these, we stress the motivation of farmers to break input dependency and the question of workload.
Attachments
No supporting information for this article##plugins.generic.statArticle.title##
Views: 1206
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- T. GIDENNE, L. FORTUN-LAMOTHE, S. COMBES, Intake restriction for the young rabbit: new strategies to enhance its digestive health and feed efficiency , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 4 (2012)
- M. BONNEAU , F. BELINE , J.Y. DOURMAD , M. HASSOUNA , C. JONDREVILLE , L. LOYON, T. MORVAN , J.M. PAILLAT , Y. RAMONET , P. ROBIN , Elements of waste from pigs : knowledge and control , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 21 No. 4 (2008): Numéro spécial : Porcherie verte
- L. PUILLET , D. SAUVANT , M. TICHIT , Interests and limits of the representation of individual variability in dynamic herd models , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2010)
- L. MONTAGNE, J.Y. DOURMAD, Foreword , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2009): Dossier : Les nouveaux enjeux de la nutrition et de l’alimentation du porc
- C. ROGUET , B. DUMONT , S. PRACHE , Selection and use of feeding sites and feeding stations by herbivores : a review , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 4 (1998)
- L. BROSSARD, N. QUINIOU, J.Y. DOURMAD, J. VAN MILGEN, Accounting for individual variability in modelling the response of pigs to the nutrient supply , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 25 No. 1 (2012)
- N. QUINIOU, J.Y. DOURMAD, J. NOBLET, (only in French) Facteurs de variation de l’appétit des truies en lactation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998)
- J.Y. DOURMAD, Voluntary feed intake in the lactating sow : factors of variation , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 1 No. 2 (1988)
- B. DUMONT, Dietary choice determinism for grazing herbivores : principal theories , INRAE Productions Animales: Vol. 8 No. 4 (1995)
