<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<article xmlns:ns1="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>INRAE Productions Animales</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Role and environmental impacts of copper and zinc in pig farming: from feed to agricultural soils</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <aff id="aff1">
                <sup>
                    <italic>1</italic>
                </sup> Animine, 74960, Annecy, France</aff>
            <aff id="aff2">
                <sup>
                    <italic>2</italic>
                </sup> PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France</aff>
            <aff id="aff3">
                <sup>
                    <italic>3</italic>
                </sup> INRAE, UR OPAALE, 35000, Rennes, France</aff>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Gourlez</surname>
                        <given-names>Emma</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>1</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname></surname>
                        <given-names>2</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Béline</surname>
                        <given-names>Fabrice</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>3</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad</surname>
                        <given-names>Jean-Yves</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>2</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Monteiro</surname>
                        <given-names>Alessandra</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>1</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Quelen</surname>
                        <given-names>Francinede</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>2</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="cor1">
                    <sup>
                        <italic>*</italic>
                    </sup>E-mail : francine.dequelen@inrae.fr</corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <abstract>
                <sec id="Abstract">
                    <title>Abstract</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>
                            <italic>Role and environmental impacts of copper and zinc in pig farming: from feed to agricultural soils</italic>
                        </bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zinc and copper are heavy metals that may have short- or long-term environmental risk for agricultural soils on which pig manure is spread. Zinc and copper are essential for pigs and farm performance, and they are added as supplements to the feed. Because of their low retention rate by animals, however, most of the amounts ingested are excreted in manure. Moreover, they are limited natural mineral resources. It is thus essential to characterize their flows better through the continuum of feed - manure - treatment - soils to manage their use better. A literature review of these flows indicates that adapting pig feed is the main mechanism available to decrease the release of zinc and copper into the environment. European Union regulations set maximum dietary concentrations of zinc and copper (e.g. 120 and 25 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM for fattening pigs, respectively). Treating farm waste is another way to derive added value from these wastes and better control the transfer of zinc and copper to soils, by concentrating these elements in products that can be exported from pig farms to regions that need them. Thus, improved knowledge of their distribution through the production chain is necessary to manage their fate and evaluate their environmental risks better. More research is thus needed to refine feeding strategies that include zinc and copper, while maintaining animal performance and health and considering strategies of manure management and treatment, as part of the circular bioeconomy.</p>
                </sec>
            </abstract>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec id="Header">
            <title>Header</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Zinc and copper are trace metals with a high environmental risk for plants and soil microorganisms, as well as for animal and human health. There is a risk of accumulation of these elements in soils as a result of repeated application of livestock manure. Due to the low uptake of these elements by pigs, most of them are found in the manure. Feeding and treatment of manure are important levers to reduce their excretion and better manage their return to the soil<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref> .</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Introduction">
            <title>Introduction</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Every year, French agriculture and agribusiness produce more than 300 million tonnes of organic effluents, of which 26 million tonnes of slurry and 0.8 million tonnes of manure spread per year in France come from pig farming (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Loyon, 2017</xref>). These effluents constitute considerable resources of nutrients and energy. However, they can also represent sources of air, water and soil pollution at both local and global levels, with harmful consequences on the health of the environment, animals and humans (OneHealth concept). The challenge is therefore to make better use of the resources contained in effluents (nutrients, energy) in order to reduce their environmental impact and to exploit their agronomic, energy and economic potential within the framework of a circular bioeconomy.</p>
            <p/>
            <p>Because of their low absorption rate by pigs and their beneficial effects on health and growth performance, zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) are fed in quantities higher than strictly required. Their effluents can then contain quantities of Zn and Cu between 4 and 10 times higher than the needs of the plants when agronomic inputs are reasoned on the basis of nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) contents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). As direct application is the main way of using effluents, these elements are therefore applied in excess and accumulate in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Coppenet <italic>et al.</italic>, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">L'Herroux <italic>et al.</italic>, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Jensen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>), leading to risks of toxicity for soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">McGrath <italic>et al.</italic>, 1995</xref>) and for plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">McGrath, 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). Furthermore, the use of pharmacological doses (see Box 1) of Zn in piglets would contribute to the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Jensen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>), which is also an important issue for their reduction.</p>
            <p/>
            <p>In order to limit these various risks, both for the environment and for animal and human health, European regulations are providing an increasingly strict framework for the quantities of Zn and Cu that can be added to animal feed (EU-2016/1095; EU-2018/1039), with nutrition being the main lever for reducing the flows. There are also regulations on the spreading of these minerals, and specific specifications or standards on the Zn and Cu content of organic fertilisers and soil improvers. Furthermore, the various effluent treatment technologies that are being developed (composting, aerobic and anaerobic digestion, etc.) can lead to an increase in the concentration of these elements, particularly in relation to dry matter (DM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hsu and Lo, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Legros <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). The knowledge and management of these flows in a context of diversification of effluent recovery channels are thus important issues.</p>
            <p/>
            <p>In this synthesis, Zn and Cu fluxes and their fate are characterised along the feed-animal-discharge-soil continuum. The first part recalls the use of Zn and Cu in pig feed and the needs of pigs. The release of these elements in effluents and their behaviour in the different pig effluent management systems are described in a second part. Finally, the impact of the return to the soil of products from pig farming and their Zn and Cu composition on the environment is discussed. Due to the limited data available on sows, this synthesis focuses on piglets and fattening pigs. </p>
            <p/>
            <p>
                <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Box 1. Glossary of terms.</title>
                    </caption>
                    <alternatives>
                        <table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
                            <col width="100%"/>
                            <col width="100%"/>
                            <col width="100%"/>
                            <col width="100%"/>
                            <col width="100%"/>
                            <thead>
<tr>
    <th xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </th>
</tr>
                            </thead>
                            <tr>
<th>
    <bold>Organic amendment</bold>: fertiliser applied to the soil to improve the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Faure <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>; Dictionary of Agroecology).<break/>
    <break/>
    <bold>Bioavailability</bold>: the proportion of an ingested nutrient that is absorbed and used by the animal (O ′ Dell, 1989).<break/>
    <break/>
    <bold>Pharmacological doses</bold>: For Zn, these doses are 2,500 to 3,000 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM in the feed, for Cu, they are 250 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM.<break/>
    <bold>
        <break/>Fertiliser</bold>: fertiliser that provides nutrients to meet the needs of plants and soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Faure <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref><italic>;</italic> Dictionnaire d'Agroécologie).<break/>
    <bold>
        <break/>
    </bold>Metallothionein: metalloprotein involved in the detoxification of cells by eliminating free radicals and having a strong affinity for Zn and Cu. This protein has an antioxidant character (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>).<break/>
    <break/>
    <bold>Supra-nutritional levels</bold>: levels of mineral intake in the feed well above the animal's needs.<break/>
    <break/>
    <bold>V-scraping: </bold>(see paragraph 2.3.b).<break/>
    <bold>
        <break/>
    </bold>Speciation: Speciation is the identification and quantification of different species, types or stages of metals. It takes into account the chemical and physical properties of elements, i.e. their chemical form, isotopic composition, oxidation state, chemical coordination and molecular structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Formentini <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). (See section 3.2).</th>
                            </tr>
                        </table>
                    </alternatives>
                    <table-wrap-foot>
                        <fn>
                            <p/>
                        </fn>
                    </table-wrap-foot>
                </table-wrap>
            </p>
            <p/>
        </sec>
        <sec id="1.-Zinc-and-copper-in-pig-feed">
            <title>1. Zinc and copper in pig feed</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Zn and Cu are considered essential minerals in pig nutrition. Their bioavailable amount in the raw materials of the basic feed ration is generally not sufficient to cover the physiological needs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Männer, 2008</xref>). Therefore, they are supplemented in the feed in quantities ranging from nutritional levels, in order to cover the animals' needs, to supra-nutritional levels (see Box 1) to improve growth or digestive health. However, as their retention is very low, the vast majority of them are found in the faeces. Reducing the dietary intake of Zn and Cu is therefore the main lever for reducing their quantity in effluents and their potential impact on the environment, while ensuring that they do not affect the animal's growth or health. To do this, it is essential to better understand their function and fate in the body, which influence their bioavailability and therefore their absorption and excretion.</p>
            <sec id="1.1-Functions-of-zinc-and-copper-in-pigs">
                <title>1.1 Functions of zinc and copper in pigs</title>
                <sec id="a.-Body-contents">
                    <title>a. Body contents</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn is abundantly present in the pig's body, with quantities in the order of 1.5 to 2.5 g for an animal of 100 kg live weight (LW). It is found mainly in the muscle tissue of the pig (about 60%) and in the skeleton (about 30%), with the bones constituting the main site of body reserve, i.e. storage and mobilisation of Zn when intakes vary. The highest concentrations of Zn are found in the bristles (200 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM) and the liver (150 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM). As in most mammals, the plasma Zn content is about 1 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> in pigs, corresponding to 0.1% of total body Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref79">Swinkels <italic>et al.</italic>, 1994</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The body content of Cu in pigs is lower, in the order of 200 mg for an animal of 100 kg body weight. Most of the Cu is found in the skeleton (40-46%), muscles (23-26%) and liver (8-10%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Cromwell, 1997</xref>). The liver is the main site of Cu accumulation when requirements are exceeded. Liver Cu content measured after slaughter is used as an indicator of the Cu status of the animals and an indicator of feeding practices. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Hodges and Fraser (1983)</xref> observed a large variability of Cu content in liver samples from pigs of different origin and age. In 9% of the cases, they observed a content lower than 12 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM, indicating a risk of deficiency, but for the majority of animals the content exceeds 20 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM, indicating supra-nutritional Cu intakes. Liver Cu content depends not only on the dietary concentration but also on the bioavailability of the intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Romeo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Physiological-and-catalytic-functions">
                    <title>b. Physiological and catalytic functions</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn is fundamental to the proper structural and functional integrity of almost 200 transcription factors. In addition, most metabolic pathways are dependent on one or more proteins that function through the presence of Zn, which is a cofactor in over 300 metalloenzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). In particular, it is a component of DNA and RNA synthetases and transferases, and many digestive enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cu is an essential element involved in many biological functions, such as cellular respiration, protection against oxidative stress and iron (Fe) transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>), as it is present in a large number of enzymes, co-factors and proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Espinosa and Stein, 2021</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn and Cu play a role in protection against oxidative stress. This is due to their role as cofactors of proteins and enzymes that protect against oxidative stress (superoxide dimutase, ceruloplasmin ferroxidase) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). Zn deficiency increases the susceptibility of endothelial cells to this stress, as Zn is the activator of metallothioneins (see Box 1), which are involved in the detoxification of cells and have a high affinity for Zn and Cu. Moreover, metallothioneins also have an antioxidant character (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>At "pharmacological" intake levels, Zn and Cu can also act as "growth promoters" in pigs. This effect may be related to an improvement in feed digestibility or animal appetite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>), a reduction in digestive disorders, in particular diarrhoea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Bikker <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>), and also to their antibiotic activity and their effect in modulating the microbiota and improving the integrity of the intestinal barrier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref81">Villagómez-Estrada <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020a</xref>)</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="1.2.-Pig-needs">
                <title>1.2. Pig needs</title>
                <p/>
                <p>An animal's requirement for an element is the amount it needs to provide to enable its body to perform all its physiological functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Schlegel, 2010</xref>). It can vary according to the response criteria used to define it. As the satisfaction of the physiological needs of animals depends on the bioavailability of minerals in the feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>), the definition of the requirement must also take into account the forms of intake. In practice, it is necessary to know the Zn and Cu requirements and their evolution with the age of the animal, in order to adapt the feed as best as possible and thus reduce the risks of deficits, which are harmful to performance, or excesses, which are harmful to the environment.</p>
                <sec id="a.-Assessment-of-piglet-and-growing-pig-needs">
                    <title>a. Assessment of piglet and growing pig needs</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Two main approaches are used to assess mineral requirement, one empirical and one factorial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Schlegel, 2010</xref>), the former being the most common for trace metals (TMEs). This consists of experimentally testing the effects of a gradual increase in the amounts of Zn and Cu in the feed in order to evaluate the response of several zootechnical or physiological parameters. Statistical treatment of the results by a linear plateau model is then generally used to describe the response and define the breakpoint requirement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Kirchgessner, 1993</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>A specific and representative response of one of the animal's functions for Zn or Cu must be observed in order to determine a criterion as characteristic of the requirement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Schlegel, 2010</xref>). For Zn, the most representative criterion generally used is its concentration in bone or plasma; for Cu, this criterion is its concentration in the liver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Jongbloed, 2010</xref>).</p>
                    <p>This is illustrated in figure 1 for Zn in post-weaning piglets, based on different literature references. Depending on the level of intake, we can define <italic>i) </italic>a deficiency zone (in red) in which the intake is not sufficient to maintain an adequate plasma level; <italic>ii) </italic>a homeostasis zone (in green) in which the plasma level remains constant thanks to the implementation of different homeostasis mechanisms (storage, excretion...) and iii) a zone of excess (in blue) in which the plasma concentration remains constant.) and <italic>iii) </italic>a zone of excess (blue) in which the plasma concentration increases with food intake, the homeostasis mechanisms being probably saturated. The breakpoint between the red and green zones defines the nutritional requirement, whereas the breakpoint between the green and blue zones indicates the appearance of a risk of excess associated with a drop in intake.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <fig>
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Figure 1: Evolution of plasma Zn concentration in post-weaning piglets as a function of the Zn content of the feed (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Hahn and Baker, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Hill <italic>et al.</italic>, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>).</title>
<p/>
                            </caption>
                            <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image1.jpeg"/>
                        </fig>
                    </p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 1: Evolution of plasma Zn concentration in post-weaning piglets as a function of the Zn content of the feed (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Hahn and Baker, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Hill <italic>et al.</italic>, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>).</title>
                            <p/>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image1.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                    <p/>
                    <p/>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council (2012)</xref> gives different references for Zn requirements for pigs depending on the growth or physiological stage of the animal. In weanlings the requirement is estimated at 80 mg Zn per kg feed. In fattening pigs, the average requirement estimated in a basic ration by the NRC (2012) is about 50 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of feed. This requirement may vary according to different criteria that modify the bioavailability of Zn: the nature of the feed, its calcium (Ca) and phytate content, and the incorporation of phytase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Spears and Hansen, 2008</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The strict requirement of piglets for Cu is estimated at 5-6 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of feed and does not exceed this value for later physiological stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>). However, this requirement does not take into account the beneficial effects of higher intakes observed on growth performance or digestive health at certain critical phases of the animal's life, such as weaning, or in breeding sows. As for Zn, the Cu requirement may vary according to different criteria that modify the bioavailability of Cu, such as the addition of more Zn in the feed.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Deficiency-effect">
                    <title>b. Deficiency effect</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The main symptoms of Zn deficiency are initially loss of appetite, the onset of diarrhoea and growth retardation. Anorexia is one of the first signs observed and leads to reduced femur size and strength in deficient piglets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). Emergent diarrhoea is due to reduced enterocyte turnover (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). In addition, a decrease in plasma or serum Zn level is observed as well as alkaline phosphatase and albumin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>). However, animals respond to Zn deficiency by regulating the various intestinal Zn transporters, but this is not sufficient to cover the premature decline in plasma and serum Zn concentration in deficient piglets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). The most prominent symptom of Zn deficiency and the last sign to appear is a hyperkeratinisation of the skin called parakeratosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cu deficiency situations in pigs are rarely observed and can occur in weanlings fed about 100 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> MS Fe, 130 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> MS Zn and 2 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> MS Cu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). Apparent signs of Cu deficiency are anaemia, limb bowing, the occurrence of spontaneous fractures and heart and vascular problems and depigmentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>). Recent results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Dalto <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>), however, indicate a risk of Cu deficiency developing in the case of Zn intake at pharmacological doses (2500-3000 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM), confirming the reduction in plasma Cu observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Hill <italic>et al.</italic> (2001)</xref> in this situation (see section 1.3.d). </p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="c.-Excess-effect">
                    <title>c. Excess effect</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn is not very toxic for most mammals. However, an excess of Zn (see Figure 1) in the food leads to a decrease in its absorption, an increase in its storage in the bones and in the enterocytes after binding to metallothioneins and therefore an increase in tissue turnover and endogenous Zn secretions. At pharmacological doses (see Box 1), excess Zn intake can be accompanied by a reduction in feed intake and therefore in growth rate (Hahn and Baker, 1983). This situation is accompanied by an alteration of Cu and Fe metabolism, with risks of deficiencies if the excess situation is prolonged (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Dalto <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). Moreover, the susceptibility of the animal to excess Zn also depends on the Ca, Fe, Cu and cadmium content of the feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cases of Cu poisoning are rare in pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). However, a long-term distribution of more than 250 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Cu can lead to a toxic effect and the signs observed are a reduction in haemoglobin levels and jaundice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">National Research Council, 2012</xref>). This can lead to a reduction in Fe storage in the liver and therefore anaemia, due to a negative reaction of Cu on Fe, which has limited absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). The tolerance of pigs to high dietary doses of Cu depends on the supply of Zn in the feed and the interactions of Zn and Cu with metallothioneins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Finally, the capacity of a feed to cover the Zn and Cu requirements of pigs and the potential toxic effect of these elements depend on their concentration but also on their bioavailability (Hahn and Baker, 1983; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>); the absorption rate and the corresponding efficiency modify the total TME requirements of the animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Männer, 2008</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="1.3.-Dietary-intake-of-zinc-and-copper">
                <title>1.3. Dietary intake of zinc and copper</title>
                <sec id="a.-Regulation">
                    <title>a. Regulation</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The European regulations concerning the maximum permitted levels of Zn and Cu in pig feed have changed since 2003 (Figure 2). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <fig>
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Figure 2: European regulations on maximum permitted levels of zinc and copper in feed for growing pigs (Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003; Regulation (EU) 2016/1095; Regulation (EU) 2018/1039 of 23 July 2018; Regulation (EU) 2019/4; Regulation (EU) 2019/6).</title>
<p/>
                            </caption>
                            <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image2.jpeg"/>
                        </fig>
                    </p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 2: European regulations on maximum permitted levels of zinc and copper in feed for growing pigs (Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003; Regulation (EU) 2016/1095; Regulation (EU) 2018/1039 of 23 July 2018; Regulation (EU) 2019/4; Regulation (EU) 2019/6).</title>
                            <p/>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image2.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                    <p/>
                    <p/>
                    <p>From 28 January 2022, the use of zinc oxide (ZnO) on veterinary prescription will be prohibited in Europe. This regulation aims to reduce the excretion of Zn in faeces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>) and its accumulation in the soil, and to limit the development of antibiotic resistance in animals and humans to which high intakes of Zn contribute (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ciesinski <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Composition-of-raw-materials">
                    <title>b. Composition of raw materials</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The basic ration of the pigs is mainly composed of cereals (mainly maize and wheat, but also barley, triticale, etc.), oil cakes (mainly soya, but also rapeseed and sunflower), oilseeds (peas, beans, etc.), cereal co-products (bran, middlings, draff, etc.), and vitaminised mineral supplements (feed additives). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cereals and protein crops contain on average 20-30 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Zn, with cereal co-products having a higher Zn content (between 70 and 90 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM, Figure 3). Oilseeds and oilcakes contain between 30 and 90 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Zn (figure 3). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cereals, their co-products, oilseeds and oilcakes contain between 5 and 15 mg of Cu per kg DM (Figure 3). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <fig>
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Figure 3: Zn content of the raw materials of the basic pig ration as a function of their Cu content (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">INRA-AFZ, 2004</xref>)</title>
<p/>
                            </caption>
                            <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image3.jpeg"/>
                        </fig>
                    </p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 3: Zn content of the raw materials of the basic pig ration as a function of their Cu content (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">INRA-AFZ, 2004</xref>)</title>
                            <p/>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image3.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                    <p/>
                </sec>
                <sec id="c.-Different-forms-of-supplementation">
                    <title>c. Different forms of supplementation</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn supplementation is essential in pig diets in order to cover the animal's needs, as the intake from raw materials alone is not sufficient. Moreover, the variation in the bioavailability of dietary Zn due to the different components of the ration must also be taken into account (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Contrary to Zn, an unsupplemented feed can theoretically cover the Cu requirement of growing pigs (about 6 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> ). However, in practice, Cu supplementation in feed is usually applied to take into account the imprecision of the total requirement estimation and to counterbalance the antagonistic effects of some elements in the ration, which affect the bioavailability of Cu and thus the requirement of the pig. Cu supplementation in the feed serves as a safety margin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn and Cu, when added as additives, can come from different sources. Sulphates ( ZnSO<sub>4 </sub> and<sub/> CuSO<sub>4</sub> ) are generally considered the reference sources in comparative bioavailability studies. However, the fact that these sources are highly soluble means that they can also be more easily bound to other elements in the ration, particularly phytates in many feedstuffs, thus reducing their bioavailability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). There are other sources of supplementation (oxides, chlorides, chelates) which have very variable physicochemical characteristics and bioavailability. In practice, ZnO and CuSO<sub>4</sub> are the most frequently used sources for animal feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). </p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="d.-Bioavailability-of-copper-and-zinc-from-feed-and-factors-of-variability">
                    <title>d. Bioavailability of copper and zinc from feed and factors of variability</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Two experimental approaches exist to measure the bioavailability of a mineral. The first is to measure the response of different physiological criteria to increasing intakes of the mineral, while remaining below the requirement (red area in Figure 1). The second is to measure this response with intakes well above requirement and measure their accumulation in the blood or in different tissues such as bone or liver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref77">Spears and Hansen, 2008</xref>). In both cases, these responses are assessed relative to a reference source (CuSO<sub>4</sub> and ZnSO<sub>4</sub> ) whose bioavailability is set at 100%. Bioavailability is then calculated by comparing the response slopes of the different sources tested. Generally speaking, the bioavailability of minerals is influenced by the type of mineral supplementation provided, by factors such as the physiological status of the animal or its mineral status, and also by interaction effects with other agonistic or antagonistic elements of the ration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">O′Dell, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Männer, 2008</xref>). Different types of possible interactions are the formation of non-absorbable complexes in the gut, competition between cations for the transport of non-specific divalent cations or even the induction of proteins by non-specific metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). The difference in bioavailability of Zn and Cu between sources could be largely explained by these phenomena that affect absorption, as well as their different physicochemical properties that affect their solubility.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Phytates form non-absorbable complexes with Zn, which reduces the bioavailability of Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). The hydrolysis of phytates allows the release of Zn, but monogastric animals do not naturally produce phytase, or in very limited quantities. The addition of microbial phytase to the ration can therefore improve Zn availability. Revy <italic>et al</italic> (2004) showed that 700 units of phytase can replace 32-43 mg of Zn in the form of sulphates. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Bikker <italic>et al.</italic> (2012)</xref> estimated that 500 phytase units can replace 27 mg of Zn as sulphate. According to the meta-analysis conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref76">Schlegel and Jondreville (2011)</xref>, only the Zn naturally present in the feed is influenced by phytates and phytase, and not the Zn added to the ration in the form of mineral or organic supplements. This antagonistic effect of phytates is increased after adding Ca to the ration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). A phytate-Ca-Zn complex is formed and precipitates Zn in the digestive tract (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>). The antagonistic effect of phytates on Zn is all the more important in young animals, which are fed diets richer in Ca than their needs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>). </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Cu is less affected by phytates and Ca in the ration, due to its higher affinity for free amino acids, with which it forms chelates, allowing Cu to retain its solubility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). However, soluble sources of Cu can interact in the digestive tract with phytates and form zinc-calcium-copper-phytate or copper-calcium-phytate complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Oberleas, 1973</xref>), which are resistant to phytase hydrolytic activity.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn has an antagonistic effect on Cu, i.e. it inhibits its absorption. This effect is due to the inducing effect of Zn on the synthesis of metallothioneins, which have a strong affinity with Cu, preventing its transfer to the <strike>intestinal </strike>epithelium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="2.-Zinc-and-copper-excretion-by-pigs-and-manure-management">
            <title>2. Zinc and copper excretion by pigs and manure management</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Zn and Cu are poorly retained by animals. They are therefore mainly excreted in excreta, mainly in faeces. The concentrations of these TMEs can then constitute factors limiting the agronomic use of these excreta. Controlling these levels is therefore important to optimise input strategies according to the effluent utilisation pathway.</p>
            <sec id="2.1.-Zinc-and-copper-retention-and-average-dung-composition">
                <title>2.1. Zinc and copper retention and average dung composition</title>
                <sec id="a.-Zinc-and-copper-retention-in-pigs">
                    <title>a. Zinc and copper retention in pigs</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Numerous studies have determined the body retention of Zn and Cu by pigs, which makes it possible to calculate the quantities excreted and their content in the effluent by difference with the ingestion. The retention is relatively low and is estimated in the literature for piglets and growing pigs at about 22 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of weight gain for Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dourmad <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>) and less than 2 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of weight gain for Cu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>). In case of intake close to the requirement, about 80 to 90% of the Zn and Cu ingested by pigs are found in pig faeces of which only 1 to 2% are excreted in urine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dourmad <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Average-composition-of-excreta">
                    <title>b. Average composition of excreta</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The composition of the slurry will mainly depend on the composition of the feed given to the pigs. As the digestibility of DM and Organic Matter (OM) of the feed is around 70-80%, and therefore higher than that of Zn and Cu (around 1-2%), these TMEs are much more concentrated in the manure than in the feed. Manure can thus contain up to 2,000 mg of Zn per kg DM and 1,000 mg of Cu per kg DM, considering all types and stages of animals and feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Dourmad <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Marcato, 2007</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="c.-Reference-for-copper-and-zinc-release-from-pigs">
                    <title>c. Reference for copper and zinc release from pigs</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>In 2016, the official references (CORPEN, 2016) setting the amounts of N, P, Zn and Cu excreted by pigs have been updated ( RMT Élevage et Environnement, 2015). They are reported in Table 1, incorporating values calculated taking into account the most recent EU regulations on maximum permitted levels in feed (Regulation (EU) 2016/1095, Regulation (EU) 2018/1039).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Table 1. Zinc and copper discharges from pigs according to CORPEN references (2016), calculated according to RMT Élevage et Environnement (2015) and new estimates taking into account new EU regulations (Regulation (EU) 2016/1095, Regulation (EU) 2018/1039).</title>
                            </caption>
                            <alternatives>
<table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <col width="20%"/>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </th>
        </tr>
    </thead>
    <tr>
        <th>Physiological stages</th>
        <th>Zn ingested</th>
        <th>Zn excreted</th>
        <th>Cu ingested</th>
        <th>Cu excreted</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Breeding sow</bold>, g/year</th>
        <th>180<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>144<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>173<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>137<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>30,0<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>30,0</italic>
                <sup>1</sup>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>29,7<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>29,7<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Post-weaning</bold>, g/pig</th>
        <th>5,8<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>5,8<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>5,3<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>5,3</italic>
            </bold>
            <italic>
                <sup>1</sup>
            </italic>
        </th>
        <th>6,6<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>4,9<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>6,6<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>4,9<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Post weaning with 3000 mg /kg feed<break/>DM</bold>, g/pig</th>
        <th>19,2</th>
        <th>18,7</th>
        <th>6,6</th>
        <th>6,6</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Feeding</bold>, g/pig</th>
        <th>36<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>28,8<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>34,1<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>26,9<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>6,0<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>6,0<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>5,9<break/>
            <bold>
                <italic>5,9<sup>1</sup>
                </italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
</table>
                            </alternatives>
                            <table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
    <p>
        <sup>1</sup>According to the new regulations (EU) 2016/1095, (EU) 2018/1039.</p>
</fn>
                            </table-wrap-foot>
                        </table-wrap>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The levels of Zn and Cu excreted by pigs, calculated taking into account the new regulations, are lower than the current CORPEN references, which were defined taking into account the old regulations (Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003). This is due to the reduction of the maximum permitted levels in feed following the new regulations of 2016 and 2018. An update of these references could take into account these new values.</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="2.2.-Dietary-leverage-and-reduction-of-copper-and-zinc-excretion">
                <title>2.2. Dietary leverage and reduction of copper and zinc excretion</title>
                <p/>
                <p>There are different dietary levers to reduce Zn and Cu excretion. It is indeed possible to vary either the form of supplementation, or the amount of Zn and Cu added to the feed, or both simultaneously. Using the approach described by Dourmad <italic>et al</italic> (2013), we calculated the Zn and Cu excretion of pigs between weaning and slaughter (from 8 to 118 kg PV) under different feeding assumptions regarding Zn and Cu levels and taking into account the evolution of the EU regulations since 2003 and the perspectives for the future. The results presented in figure 4A and 4B clearly show that the regulatory changes have led to a strong reduction in excretion for both Zn and Cu.</p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 4: Influence of changes in regulations on zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) content in feed on excretion and effluent content: amount of Zn (A) and Cu (B) excreted per pig between 8 and 118 kg live weight (LW), and average Zn (C) and Cu (D) content of manure and digestate from anaerobic digestion; FC, 0FC: with or without Zn as a growth promoter</title>
                            <p>The outlook is 100 ppm Zn for post-weaning piglets and 80 ppm Zn for the fattening pig, and 100 ppm Cu for the first post-weaning period, 80 ppm Cu for the end of post-weaning and 15 ppm Cu in the feed for fattening pigs.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image4.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 4: Influence of changes in regulations on zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) content in feed on excretion and effluent content: amount of Zn (A) and Cu (B) excreted per pig between 8 and 118 kg live weight (LW), and average Zn (C) and Cu (D) content of manure and digestate from anaerobic digestion; FC, 0FC: with or without Zn as a growth promoter</title>
                        <p>The outlook is 100 ppm Zn for post-weaning piglets and 80 ppm Zn for the fattening pig, and 100 ppm Cu for the first post-weaning period, 80 ppm Cu for the end of post-weaning and 15 ppm Cu in the feed for fattening pigs.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image4.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p/>
                <p>For Zn and with the regulation in force from 2022 onwards, a 63% reduction in excretion per pig between 8 and 118 kg of PV is observed compared to the situation before 2003 (31.5 <italic>vs </italic>85.4 g/pig). For Cu the evolution is even more marked since with the current regulation the excretion is reduced by 80% compared to the situation before 2003 (7.6 <italic>vs </italic>38.1 g/pig between 8 and 118 kg PV). </p>
                <p/>
                <p>This evolution of excretion was also accompanied by a strong reduction in the content of the excreta. For Zn, this content has fallen from 2,100 to 1,000 mg.kg<sup>-1 </sup> DM and for Cu from 1,100 to 250 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM. Further reduction prospects can be envisaged (Figure 4.C and 4.D), but they require further knowledge of animal needs and the bioavailability of sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Dourmad <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013</xref>).</p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 5: Zn and Cu content of manure (mg.kg-1 DM) as a function of the Zn or Cu content of the feed and the sources of input (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Levasseur and Texier, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Creech <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Van Heugten <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Hernández <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Liu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>).</title>
                            <p>Dark blue: pregnant sows; light blue: lactating sows; green: post-weaning piglets; yellow: fattening pigs.   Diamond: no supplementation; Round: inorganic source of Zn or Cu; Triangle: organic source of Zn or Cu.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image5.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 5: Zn and Cu content of manure (mg.kg-1 DM) as a function of the Zn or Cu content of the feed and the sources of input (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Levasseur and Texier, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Creech <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Van Heugten <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Hernández <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Liu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>).</title>
                        <p>Dark blue: pregnant sows; light blue: lactating sows; green: post-weaning piglets; yellow: fattening pigs.   Diamond: no supplementation; Round: inorganic source of Zn or Cu; Triangle: organic source of Zn or Cu.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image5.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p/>
                <p>The composition of manure also depends on the physiological stages of the animals reared (figure 5). The Zn and Cu contents, expressed relative to DM, depend both on their content in the feed and on the composition of the feed, in particular its fibre content which influences OM digestibility. Many studies have investigated the effect of modifying the Zn and/or Cu content of the feed on their concentrations in the manure. After reduction of the levels of these TMEs in the feed (to about 70 mg.kg<sup>-1 </sup> DM of Zn and 10 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Cu, compared to levels complying with European regulations, i.e. 150 and 25 mg.kg<sup>-1 </sup> DM respectively), no effect on the performance of fattening pigs or on carcass quality was observed (Paboeuf <italic>et al</italic>, 2001; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Creech <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref80">Van Heugten <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Liu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref82">Villagómez-Estrada <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020b</xref>). All these studies show that the reduced Zn and Cu regimes are effective in reducing Zn and Cu concentrations in manure. Different mineral sources have also been tested to decrease Zn and Cu excretion (Figure 5). </p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="2.3-Pig-manure-management-and-impact-on-zinc-and-copper">
                <title>2.3 Pig manure management and impact on zinc and copper</title>
                <p/>
                <p>Manure management is an opportunity to better control the distribution of TMEs in pig manure before it is returned to the soil and thus reduce its environmental impact. Effluent treatment does not eliminate metals but influences their concentration, due to OM degradation and/or phase separations, and their speciation (see Box 1), due to different chemical and biochemical mechanisms (adsorption, chemisorption, precipitation...) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Couturier, 2002</xref>).</p>
                <sec id="a.-Pig-manure-management-systems">
                    <title>a. Pig manure management systems</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Although the most common way of managing manure is storage followed by spreading (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers, 2008</xref>), almost 12% of French pig farms were already using an alternative or complementary manure treatment technique to 'storage - spreading' in 2008 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Loyon, 2017</xref>). The treatments applied can be grouped into different categories: mechanical (phase separation), biological (aerobic treatment or anaerobic digestion, composting), chemical and thermal. These different technologies can be combined in different ways and are part of the overall manure management system (Figure 6 and Table 2).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <fig>
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Figure 6. Livestock manure and its possible fate (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Loyon, 2017</xref>).</title>
<p/>
                            </caption>
                            <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image6.jpeg"/>
                        </fig>
                    </p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 6. Livestock manure and its possible fate (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Loyon, 2017</xref>).</title>
                            <p/>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image6.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                    <p/>
                    <p/>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Table 2. Main manure management pathways for pigs (after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Loyon, 2017</xref>) .</title>
                            </caption>
                            <alternatives>
<table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </th>
        </tr>
    </thead>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Type of treatment</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Type of effluent treated</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Products obtained</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Next possible treatment</bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>
                <italic>Mechanical Treatments</italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Phase separation<break/>
            <italic>Sedimentation, screw <break/>compactor, centrifugation</italic>
        </th>
        <th>Slurry<break/>Liquid phase from a <break/>separation in a building<break/>Digestate from methanisation<break/>Purified effluent</th>
        <th>Solid phase<break/>
        </th>
        <th>Anaerobic digestion<break/>Composting<break/>Thermal treatment<break/>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th/>
        <th/>
        <th>Liquid phase</th>
        <th>Aerobic treatment</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>
                <italic>Biological treatments</italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Aerobic treatment</th>
        <th>Slurry<break/>Liquid phase from a<break/>separation in a building<break/>Liquid phase from <break/>phase separation</th>
        <th>Purified effluent</th>
        <th> Phase separation</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Anaerobic digestion<break/>
            <italic>Mesophilic (35-40°C), <break/>hermophilic (55°C)<break/>
            </italic>
        </th>
        <th>Slurry<break/>Solid phase from a<break/>building separation<break/>Solid phase from phase separation<break/>Manure</th>
        <th>Digestate</th>
        <th>Phase separation<break/>Heat treatment<break/>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Composting<break/>
        </th>
        <th>Solid phase from building separation<break/>Solid phase from <break/>phase separation<break/>Manure</th>
        <th>Compost</th>
        <th/>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>
                <italic>Thermal treatment<break/>
                </italic>
            </bold>
            <italic>Incineration, gasification<break/>thermal gasification, drying <break/>drying, evapo-concentration</italic>
        </th>
        <th>Solid phase from a<break/>building separation<break/>Solid phase from <break/>phase separation<break/>Manure</th>
        <th>Bottom ash<break/>Fly ash<break/>
        </th>
        <th/>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>
                <italic>Chemical treatments</italic>
            </bold>
        </th>
        <th>Slurry</th>
        <th/>
        <th/>
    </tr>
</table>
                            </alternatives>
                            <table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
    <p/>
</fn>
                            </table-wrap-foot>
                        </table-wrap>
                    </p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Effect-of-treatments-on-zinc-and-copper-in-effluents">
                    <title>b. Effect of treatments on zinc and copper in effluents</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Table 3 summarises the main effects observed on Zn and Cu during the treatments.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Table 3. Effects of different pig manure management and treatment on Zn and Cu elements.</title>
                            </caption>
                            <alternatives>
<table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <col width="25%"/>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </th>
        </tr>
    </thead>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Management/Processing</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Treatment effects on Zn and Cu</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Parameter to be taken into account</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>References</bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Storage</th>
        <th>- Increase in the influence of the distribution <break/>of Zn and Cu between the different <break/>classes of particles : <break/>the binding of metals to the particles</th>
        <th>Type of storage<break/>Duration <break/>Temperature</th>
        <th><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Popovic and Jensen (2012)</xref></th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Phase separation</th>
        <th>- Concentration of Zn and Cu in the solid phase <break/>as a function of separation efficiency</th>
        <th>Scraping method<break/>in the building</th>
        <th>Loussouarn <italic>et al (</italic>2014)<italic>
                <break/>
</italic>            Likiliki <italic>et al (</italic>2020)</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th/>
        <th/>
        <th>Type of separator</th>
        <th>Møller <italic>et al (</italic>2007)<italic>
                <break/>
            </italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers (2008)</xref><italic>
                <break/>
            </italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Pantelopoulos and Aronsson (2020)</xref></th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Aerobic treatment</th>
        <th>- Increased concentration of Zn and Cu, relative to OM and DM<break/>- Redistribution of Zn and Cu <break/>between solid (screenings) and liquid phases <break/>(supernatant and sludge)</th>
        <th>Type of separators</th>
        <th>
            <italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Levasseur (2003)</xref><break/>Béline et al (2004)</italic> 
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Methanisation / Anaerobic digestion</th>
        <th>- Increase in Zn and Cu concentration, relative to OM and DM<break/>- Increase in the share of Zn and Cu<break/>in solid particles<break/>- Increased concentration of Zn and Cu <break/>of Zn and Cu in the poorly bioavailable fraction<break/>available fraction(unrecognized symbol) Decrease in the phytoavailability<break/> of these elements</th>
        <th>Temperature <break/>pH<break/>Retention time<break/>hydraulic<break/>Oxidation-reduction<break/>reduction</th>
        <th>
            <italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Marcato (2007)</xref><break/>Marcato et al (2009)<break/>Amaral et al (2014)<break/>Matheri et al (2016)<break/>Legros et al (2017)<break/>Yang et al (2020)</italic>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Thermal treatment (incineration)</th>
        <th>- Cu accumulation in bottom ash<break/>- Concentration of Zn and Cu <break/>in particles &gt; 30 µm</th>
        <th/>
        <th>
            <italic>Møller et al (2007)<break/>Kuligowski et al (2008)</italic>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>Composting</th>
        <th>- Increased concentration of<break/>of Zn and Cu, relative to OM and DM<break/>- Increase of soluble part <break/>at the beginning of the process and then <break/>- Decrease of Cu in this form <break/>at the end of the composting process<break/>- Decrease in bioavailability factor<break/>of Zn and Cu</th>
        <th>Moisture <break/>pH <break/>Nitrogen content<break/>Dissolved organic carbon <break/>organic carbon content <break/>Humic matter<break/>content</th>
        <th>
            <italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hsu and Lo (2001)</xref><break/>He et al (2009)<break/>Santos et al (2018)<break/>Li et al (2019)</italic>
        </th>
    </tr>
</table>
                            </alternatives>
                            <table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
    <p/>
</fn>
                            </table-wrap-foot>
                        </table-wrap>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold> - Phase separation in buildings</bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Phase separation directly in the building, e.g. by the V-scraping process, is fairly recent and the characterisation of the products obtained is still poorly documented. Zn and Cu follow mostly the solid fraction (between 90 and 95%) and this fraction is mainly treated by composting or anaerobic digestion. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Loussouarn <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Likiliki <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>- Duration and type of storage</bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Few studies exist on the effect of storage on Zn and Cu. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Popovic and Jensen (2012)</xref>, storage has no significant effect on Zn and Cu concentrations but increases the binding of Zn and Cu to less soluble solid particles.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>- Mechanical phase separation</bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>As only about 10% of Zn and Cu are soluble, these elements are mainly found in the solid fraction after separation from the slurry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Nicholson and Chambers, 2008</xref>). This redistribution will however depend on the type of separator or combination of separation processes used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Pantelopoulos and Aronsson, 2020</xref>). The separation of Zn and Cu to the solid phase is highest for chemical treatment with filtration (99.5% Zn and 94.9% Cu in the solid phase) followed by centrifugation (38.1% Zn and 31.1% Cu) and then screw compacting (7.1% Zn and 6.6% Cu) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Popovic <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Pantelopoulos and Aronsson, 2020</xref>). Several studies evaluate the effect of combining different types of separation with an aerobic biological treatment plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Levasseur, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Béline <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>). The separation results in lower concentrations in the liquid phase, thus reducing the annual soil load of Zn and Cu after the liquid fraction is used as fertiliser by spreading, compared to spreading raw manure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Béline <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Popovic <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>). The solid fraction can then be exported and used as organic fertiliser, usually after further treatment (drying or composting).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>- Methanisation</bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>As several nutrients such as N, P, K, Zn, Cu are retained during anaerobic digestion, the resulting digestate can be used as fertiliser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Marcato, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Marcato <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Amaral <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>). However, the transformation of part of the OM into biogas leads to an increase in Zn and Cu contents in relation to the DM and an effect on their speciation (see Box 1) which is important to take into account. Furthermore, Zn and Cu can also stimulate or inhibit the bacteria responsible for anaerobic digestion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Matheri <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>), thus modifying biogas production.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>- Drying by incineration </bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>After incineration of the solid fraction of slurry or digestate from anaerobic digestion, two types of ash are obtained, a bottom ash (which tends to be richer and to accumulate Cu) and a so-called "fly ash" (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Møller <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <bold>- Composting</bold>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Composting leads to the production of humic acid, the main constituent of humus, and Cu has a better affinity for this humic acid than Zn, which influences their distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">He <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>) in the final product of composting: compost. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hsu and Lo (2001)</xref> observed an increase in the soluble Cu content during the first 18 days of the composting process (up to 16% of Cu in this form) and then a decrease in this content to 3% of Cu in soluble form in the final compost. A lesser effect was observed on the soluble part of Zn, which reached a maximum of 2%. Composting therefore seems to have a significant effect on the risk of Cu leaching, but less on that of Zn. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Hsu and Lo (2001)</xref> observed that most of the Zn and Cu were in the low bioavailable fraction of the compost. The addition of material, such as straw or other organic substrates, or mineral additives, reduces the availability of heavy metals during composting and facilitates their transfer to more stable forms. This is related to the formation of compounds with affinity to the humic matter of the compost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Santos <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Li <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). Furthermore, the addition of OM is also accompanied by a reduction in Zn and Cu content through dilution.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>One of the purposes of these different treatments is the production of organic fertilisers or soil improvers (see Box 1) that are exported outside the livestock farms to crop systems where OM is lacking, such as market gardening. This reduces the risk of accumulation of elements such as Zn and Cu in pig farm soils by optimising their use. However, this requires that these products be standardised and take into account the impact of these treatments on the speciation of the TMEs and therefore their bioavailability to plants.</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="3.-Pig-manure-application-and-consequences-on-soils">
            <title>3. Pig manure application and consequences on soils</title>
            <sec id="3.1.-Zn-and-Cu-input-to-soils-and-regulations">
                <title>3.1. Zn and Cu input to soils and regulations</title>
                <p/>
                <p>In France, 78% of the Zn and 50% of the Cu brought to the surface of agricultural soils come from the spreading of livestock manure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Belon <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>).</p>
                <sec id="a.-Several-sources-of-input">
                    <title>a. Several sources of input</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The Zn and Cu present in soils can come from natural or exogenous sources (e.g. fertiliser inputs). Indeed, metals are found naturally in soils after alteration of the parent rock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Legros, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). The composition of Zn and Cu and their behaviour depend on the type of soil and the parent rock on which it develops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Legros, 2008</xref>). Exogenous inputs are also sources of soil enrichment in Zn and Cu: phosphate fertilisers, inputs of manure and slurry, spreading of sewage sludge, 'urban' composts and phytosanitary treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Baize, 1997</xref>). It is therefore important to control Zn and Cu inputs, which can become toxic for plants or soil micro-organisms.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Regulations-on-the-spreading-of-livestock-manure">
                    <title>b. Regulations on the spreading of livestock manure</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>In view of the risks associated with the input of Zn and Cu through the application of organic fertilisers and soil improvers, maximum levels of these elements have been set for their marketing (Table 4). However, these standards do not apply to raw livestock manure spread as part of a land application plan.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>
                        <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                            <label>Table</label>
                            <caption>
<title>Table 4. Maximum permitted contents (mg.kg-1 DM) in fertilisers according to different regulations or standards.</title>
                            </caption>
                            <alternatives>
<table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <col width="33%"/>
    <thead>
        <tr>
            <th xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </th>
        </tr>
    </thead>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Type of fertilizer</bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Zinc </bold>
        </th>
        <th>
            <bold>Copper </bold>
        </th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Organic fertilizer</bold>
        </th>
        <th/>
        <th/>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>  Ecolabel<sup>1</sup>
        </th>
        <th>300</th>
        <th>100</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>  Afnor<sup>2</sup>
        </th>
        <th>600</th>
        <th>300</th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <th>
            <bold>Methanation digestate</bold>
            <sup>3</sup>
        </th>
        <th>1 500</th>
        <th>600</th>
    </tr>
</table>
                            </alternatives>
                            <table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
    <p>
        <sup>1 </sup>Decision (EU) 2015/2099. <sup>2</sup>AFNOR standard NF U44-051 (April 2006). <sup>3</sup>Order of 13 June 2017 (NF U44-051 of April 2006)</p>
</fn>
                            </table-wrap-foot>
                        </table-wrap>
                    </p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Pig manure for fattening contains about 955 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Zn and 300 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM of Cu when this type of animal is fed a feed that complies with current European regulations (120 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> Zn and 25 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> Cu), these values being slightly higher if the entire post-weaning/fattening period is considered (figure 5). However, effluent treatment will generally concentrate these elements to a high degree and thus increase their content. Thus, given the current Zn and Cu levels in feed, these levels exceed Afnor standards and even more so the European Ecolabel for products resulting from certain treatments. A specific rule was recently established for methanisation digestates with higher thresholds set at 1,500 and 600 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of DM respectively for Zn and Cu (NF U44-051). However, even with these different regulations, the quantities of Zn and Cu applied remain higher than the needs of the crops.</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="3.2-Forms-and-reactivities-of-Zn-and-Cu-in-effluents">
                <title>3.2 Forms and reactivities of Zn and Cu in effluents</title>
                <p/>
                <p>Effluents are generally recovered by spreading on soils and the determination of the speciation of Zn and Cu (see Box 1) in these effluents is necessary to better predict the mobility and availability of these elements in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Legros <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). Several analytical methods exist to determine the speciation of elements in a matrix: X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), for example, provides information on the atomic environment around an atom and its degree of oxidation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Legros, 2008</xref>). Extraction methods (selective extraction, sequential extraction, etc.) also exist, in order to isolate several fractions with a higher or lower bioavailability and mobility in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">He <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="3.3-Impacts-of-exogenous-Zn-and-Cu-input">
                <title>3.3 Impacts of exogenous Zn and Cu input</title>
                <p/>
                <p>Zn and Cu are essential trace elements for good plant growth, but they are also heavy metals with a high environmental pollution potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Kickinger <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009</xref>). In high concentrations in effluents, Zn and Cu can accumulate in soils and become toxic to plants or micro-organisms and also pose risks to aquatic ecosystems (see 3.3.b). Excessive concentrations in the soil can lead to yield reductions on certain crops such as legumes and straw cereals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">McGrath, 1981</xref>), with the free forms of Zn and Cu being the most phytotoxic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref78">Suttle, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). Generally, pig manure is applied to soils assuming a N application rate of 170 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> .an<sup>-1</sup> . This corresponds to Zn flows of about 2.38 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> .year<sup>-1</sup> and Cu flows of about 1.53 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> .year<sup>-1</sup> . These inputs far exceed the needs of the crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Marcato, 2007</xref>) since it is estimated, for example for wheat, that the plants export about 50 and 200 g.ha<sup>-1</sup> .an<sup>-1 </sup> respectively. Moreover, the soil microbiota is also very sensitive to an increase in the content of TMEs. Zn and Cu once applied can exhibit different behaviours: they can accumulate in soils, be taken up by plants or be leached. This will depend on their speciation, the type of soil and the type of plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Legros, 2008</xref>).</p>
                <sec id="a.-Harvesting-by-plants">
                    <title>a. Harvesting by plants</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn and Cu are essential minerals for good plant growth and are therefore taken up by plants. Plants contain between 10 and 100 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> MB of Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>). They require on average between 5 and 20 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> MB of Cu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Legros, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). Cu deficiency in plants leads to reduced plant growth, promotes leaf chlorosis and causes cytotoxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). In some regions there is a risk of Zn and Cu deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">GIS Sol, 2001</xref>), with significant variability depending on the presence of pig or poultry farms and vineyards. Amendments rich in Zn and Cu may therefore be of interest. Pig manure has a higher Zn content than Cu, which leads to a more rapid increase in Zn than Cu content in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). There is no risk of Cu contamination in the human food chain, as it is not very mobile in the plant and therefore rarely reaches the consumable parts of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Marcato, 2007</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="b.-Flows-to-groundwater">
                    <title>b. Flows to groundwater</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn and Cu accumulated in the soil after spreading can subsequently be leached and transferred to the water system. This depends on the speciation of these elements which will be more or less soluble depending on the physico-chemical characteristics of the environment. These transfers to aquatic ecosystems are also favoured by erosion phenomena, with Zn and Cu being transferred with soil or OM particles. In this way, Zn and Cu can be taken up by marine organisms and contribute to the contamination of the food chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Legros <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec id="c.-Accumulation-in-soils">
                    <title>c. Accumulation in soils</title>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Many studies highlight the fact that Cu is a much less accessible and less mobile element than Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Mallmann <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Marszałek <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). Indeed, Cu has a higher affinity for OM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>) and is therefore more sensitive to soil properties such as OM content or pH. It can therefore become more or less mobile when these characteristics vary, but will mainly accumulate in the soil. Zn is also a poorly mobile element in soils, but it is less sensitive to variations in soil characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Marszałek <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). In the soil solution (water circulating in the open spaces of the soil), Zn will be mostly in the free form Zn<sup>2+</sup> while Cu will be mostly in the form complexed with OM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>).</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Zn and Cu from applied livestock manure accumulate overwhelmingly in the topsoil (0-20cm), i.e. the surface layer of soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Jondreville <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Revy, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Marszałek <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">McGrath (1981)</xref>, only 2-10% of the Cu brought in by land application is subsequently leached or taken up by plants. In soils that have received pig manure for many years, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref> observed an accumulation of carbon in the surface layer, having a high affinity with metals, in particular with Cu. This may explain the accumulation of these elements in this soil layer. Moreover, Zn and Cu are not very mobile and are therefore transferred in small quantities to the deeper soil layers. Zn and Cu can be transported by humic acid after formation of chelate complexes and these complexes are more stable when formed with Cu than with Zn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>). This complexation of Zn and Cu in soils reduces the content of these elements in free form and thus their phytotoxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). The soil pH is also a factor that has a strong influence on the solubility of Zn and Cu. Its increase improves the adsorption of minerals on OM and thus decreases their mobility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Levasseur, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). Acidic soils, as is often the case in Brittany, therefore have a higher solubility of Zn and Cu. Mallmann <italic>et al</italic> (2014) assessed the effect of tillage practices on the distribution of Zn and Cu following pig manure inputs over a long period. They showed that no-till practices amplify the accumulation of Zn and Cu at the soil surface and reduce their mobility to depths exceeding 20 cm.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>Many studies have evaluated the effect of long-term application of pig manure on Zn and Cu accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Coppenet <italic>et al.</italic>, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">L'Herroux <italic>et al.</italic>, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">McGrath <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Formentini <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Benedet <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Benedet <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Coppenet <italic>et al.</italic> (1993)</xref>, between 1973 and 1988, i.e. after 15 years of regular application of pig manure, the soils of Finistère (France) were enriched in Zn by nearly 0.37 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> .an<sup>-1</sup> and in Cu by nearly 0.22 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> .an<sup>-1</sup> . They also showed that this increase is higher the more manure is applied. L'Herroux <italic>et al</italic> (1997) were interested in the speciation of Zn and Cu in the soils of Brittany (France), after 6 years of application of pig manure, and in their distribution in the different fractions determined according to their bioavailability: in the long term, Cu is mainly found in the poorly bioavailable fraction and with time the share of Zn increases in the slightly more bioavailable fractions These observations on the speciation of Zn and Cu or on their behaviour in soils are important to predict their effect on the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Formentini <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). Indeed, the toxic effect of Cu in soils is a long-term environmental problem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">López Alonso <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">De Conti <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref> evaluated this effect of Zn and Cu accumulation on soils and highlighted that the phytotoxic effect of Zn and Cu does not appear even after several years of pig manure application, because plants modify soil conditions so that the chemical species can complex with dissolved organic carbon. A certain stability of Zn and Cu is then observed. Plants generally tolerate Zn levels ranging from 10 to 100 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM and Cu levels in soils ranging from 2 to 40 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Coppenet <italic>et al.</italic> (1993)</xref>, some Zn-sensitive plants, such as maize, can suffer from deficiencies in this element when the soil content is below 1.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM and a phytotoxic effect is observed when this content exceeds 120 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM. In Breton soils, with a pH close to 6, this phytotoxic effect is observed when the accumulated content of Zn and Cu exceeds 120 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM. Cu tends to accumulate in root tissues and can be transferred to the stem; Cu toxicity in plants thus affects root growth and plant morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">McGrath <italic>et al.</italic> (1995)</xref> reported that soil microbial activity is disrupted when soil Zn levels exceed 100 to 200 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM. Zhang <italic>et al</italic> (2016) studied the effect of pig manure application on soil microbial community and put forward that Zn and Cu can improve soil fertility by allowing the development of soil biomass. According to them, Zn has the greatest influence on the soil microbiota.</p>
                    <p/>
                    <p>The activity of earthworms in soils is reduced when the Cu concentration exceeds 50 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> DM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Gräber <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>). Toxicity of Zn and Cu can also affect animal species after spreading pig manure on pastures. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">López Alonso <italic>et al.</italic> (2000)</xref> showed that in regions with intensive pig farming, more than 20% of the livestock have liver Cu concentrations exceeding the potentially toxic concentration of 150 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> . Sheep in particular are extremely sensitive to excess Cu and cases of poisoning of sheep grazing on grassland fertilised with Cu-rich pig manure have been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Poulsen, 1998</xref>).</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
            <sec id="3.4.-Specific-case-of-the-return-to-the-soil-of-products-from-the-treatment-of-pig-manure">
                <title>3.4. Specific case of the return to the soil of products from the treatment of pig manure</title>
                <p/>
                <p>As mentioned earlier, the treatment of pig manure does not remove Zn and Cu but concentrates it in certain fractions. Møller <italic>et al</italic> (2007) indicate that application of the solid phase from centrifugal phase separation results in a lower soil load of Zn and Cu than pure slurry, but this is probably very dependent on the generally N-based fertilisation rules. Studies evaluate the germination index of seeds after fertilisation with compost, which allows to determine the phytotoxicity and maturity of the latter. According to He <italic>et al</italic> (2009), this index increases during the composting process: this means that this type of treatment leads to a decrease in phytotoxicity and improves root growth. Furthermore, this germination index can be predicted by the total content of Zn and Cu and other metals (lead). </p>
                <p/>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 7. Copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) flows through the pig industry and its effluent management systems. Example of fattening pigs. Circular bioeconomy approach.</title>
                            <p/>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image7.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 7. Copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) flows through the pig industry and its effluent management systems. Example of fattening pigs. Circular bioeconomy approach.</title>
                        <p/>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image7.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p/>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Conclusion">
            <title>Conclusion</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Zn and Cu are essential TMEs for pigs but potentially toxic for the environment, and they are limited resources. It is therefore essential to characterise their flow throughout the pig production chain in order to limit their use and application to agricultural land. Figure 7 summarises this feed-animal-discharge-soil continuum in the context of the circular bioeconomy. </p>
            <p/>
            <p>Reducing dietary Zn and Cu, while respecting the animal's needs, is the main way to reduce the content of these two elements in pig excrement. This can be achieved by adapting inputs as closely as possible to changing needs and by using more bioavailable sources. Effluent treatment then allows better management of the return of Zn and Cu to the soil by modifying their speciation and their content in relation to the DM. Separative treatments allow a redistribution of these elements between two phases and facilitate their export to regions with soils that are less rich in Cu and Zn, or even deficient, and on crops that have a high need.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Authors'-contributions">
            <title>Authors' contributions</title>
            <p/>
            <p>Emma Gourlez, Fabrice Beline, Jean-Yves Dourmad, Alessandra Monteiro, Francine De Quelen participated in the definition and content of the article. Emma Gourlez wrote the manuscript and took into account the corrections made by the other authors. Francine De Quelen is the coordinator of the project funding this study, which was carried out as part of a thesis directed by Fabrice Beline. All co-authors have read and approved the final version of the article.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Acknowledgements">
            <title>Acknowledgements</title>
            <p/>
            <p>This synthesis was conducted as part of the RECUIZ project "Optimisation of copper and zinc recycling, from their use in animal feed to their return to the soil", financed by the ADEME's GRAINE call for projects and Emma Gourlez's CIFRE thesis co-financed by Animine.</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Amaral</surname>
                        <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kunz</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Radis Steinmetz</surname>
                        <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Justi</surname>
                        <given-names>K.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Zinc and copper distribution in swine wastewater treated by anaerobic digestion</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage. 141</source>, <fpage>132</fpage>-<lpage>137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.021</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Baize</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1997</year>. <article-title>Teneurs totales en éléments traces métalliques dans les sols (France)</article-title>. <source>INRA Éditions</source>, <volume> Paris</volume>, <fpage>408p</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Béline</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Daumer</surname>
                        <given-names>M.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guiziou</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Biological aerobic treatment of pig slurry in France: Nutrients removal efficiency and separation performances</article-title>. <source>ASAE</source>, <volume> 47</volume>, <fpage>857</fpage>-<lpage>864. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.16097</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Belon</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Boisson</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Deportes</surname>
                        <given-names>I.Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Eglin</surname>
                        <given-names>T.K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Feix</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bispo</surname>
                        <given-names>A.O.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Galsomies</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Leblond</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guellier</surname>
                        <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>An inventory of trace elements inputs to french agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ</source>, <volume> 439</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>-<lpage>95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.011</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Benedet</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>De Conti</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ribeiro Lazzari</surname>
                        <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Müller Júnior</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pinheiro Dick</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lourenzi</surname>
                        <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lovato</surname>
                        <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Klein</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Copper and zinc in rhizosphere soil and toxicity potential in white oats (Avena sativa) grown in soil with long-term pig manure application</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut</source>, <volume> 230</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>-<lpage>10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Benedet</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pinheiro Dick</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brunetto</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>dos Santos Júnior</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ferreira</surname>
                        <given-names>G.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lourenzi</surname>
                        <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Comin</surname>
                        <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Copper and zinc distribution in humic substances of soil after 10 years of pig manure application in south of Santa Catarina, Brazil</article-title>. <source>Environ. Geochem. Health</source>, <fpage>42</fpage>-<lpage>3301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bikker</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jongbloed</surname>
                        <given-names>A.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Thissen</surname>
                        <given-names>J.T.N.M</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Meta-analysis of effects of microbial phytase on digestibility and bioavailability of copper and zinc in growing pigs</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. 90</source>, <fpage>134</fpage>-<lpage>136. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.53798</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bikker</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jongbloed</surname>
                        <given-names>A.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>van Baal</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Dose-dependent effects of copper supplementation of nursery diets on growth performance and fecal consistency in weaned pigs</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. 94</source>, <fpage>181</fpage>-<lpage>186. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ciesinski</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guenther</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pieper</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kalisch</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bednorz</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wieler</surname>
                        <given-names>L.H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>High dietary zinc feeding promotes persistence of multi-resistant E</article-title>. <source>Coli in the swine gut. PLOS ONE</source>, <volume> 13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191660</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Coppenet</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Golven</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Simon</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Le Corre</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Le Roy</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1993</year>. <article-title>Chemical evolution of soils in intensive livestock farms: example of Finistère</article-title>. <source>Agronomie</source>, <volume> EDP Sciences</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>-<lpage>83. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19930201</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref11">
                <label>11</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Couturier</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2002</year>. <article-title>Effects of anaerobic digestion on micropollutants and pathogens</article-title>. <source>Solagro</source>, <volume> 5p. </volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref12">
                <label>12</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Creech</surname>
                        <given-names>B.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Spears</surname>
                        <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Flowers</surname>
                        <given-names>W.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hill</surname>
                        <given-names>G.M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lloyd</surname>
                        <given-names>K.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Armstrong</surname>
                        <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Engle</surname>
                        <given-names>T.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Effect of dietary trace mineral concentration and source (inorganic vs</article-title>. <source>chelated) on performance</source>, <volume> mineral status</volume>, <fpage>and fecal mineral excretion in pigs from weaning through finishing. J. Anim. Sci. 82</fpage>-<lpage>2147. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8272140x</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref13">
                <label>13</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cromwell</surname>
                        <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1997</year>. <article-title>Copper as a nutrient for animals</article-title>. <source>In: Richardson H.W. (Ed). Handbook of copper compounds and applications. Marcel Dekker Inc. Publisher</source>, <fpage>177</fpage>-<lpage>202</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref14">
                <label>14</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dalto</surname>
                        <given-names>D.B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guay</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martel-Kennes</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Talbot</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lessard</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Matte</surname>
                        <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lapointe</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Effects of zinc oxide levels in post-weaning piglet feed on zinc, copper and iron metabolism</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 53</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>-<lpage>238</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref16">
                <label>16</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>De Conti</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ceretta</surname>
                        <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ferreira</surname>
                        <given-names>P.A.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lourenzi</surname>
                        <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Girotto</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lorensini</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tiecher</surname>
                        <given-names>T.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Marchezan</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Anchieta</surname>
                        <given-names>M.G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brunetto</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Soil solution concentrations and chemical species of copper and zinc in a soil with a history of pig slurry application and plant cultivation</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 216</source>, <fpage>374</fpage>-<lpage>386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.040</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref17">
                <label>17</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad</surname>
                        <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pomar</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Masse</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2002</year>. <article-title>Modelling the flow of environmentally hazardous compounds in a pig farm</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 34</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>-<lpage>194. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref18">
                <label>18</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad</surname>
                        <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Garcia-Launay</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Narcy</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Pig nutrition: impact on nitrogen, phosphorus, Cu and Zn in pig manure and on emissions of ammonia, greenhouse gas and odours</article-title>. <source>BATFarm Workshop</source>, <volume> Rennes</volume>, <fpage>13p. </fpage>-<lpage>20 March 2013</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref19">
                <label>19</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Espinosa</surname>
                        <given-names>C.D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Stein</surname>
                        <given-names>H.H</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Digestibility and metabolism of copper in diets for pigs and influence of dietary copper on growth performance, intestinal health, and overall immune status: a review</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechno. 12</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref20">
                <label>20</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Faure</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Roux</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Sarthou</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Organic input: Definition</article-title>. <source>Dictionary of Agroecology. https://dicoagroecologie.fr/dictionnaire/intrant-organique/</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref21">
                <label>21</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Formentini</surname>
                        <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Legros</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fernandes</surname>
                        <given-names>C.V.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pinheiro</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Le Bars</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Levard</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mallman</surname>
                        <given-names>F.J.K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>da Veiga</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Doelsch</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Radical change of Zn speciation in pig slurry amended soil: Key role of nano-sized sulfide particles</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut. 222</source>, <fpage>495</fpage>-<lpage>503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.056</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref22">
                <label>22</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Gourlez</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad</surname>
                        <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Monteiro</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Beline</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>DE Quelen</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Role and environmental impact of copper and zinc in pig farming: from feed to effluent return to the soil</article-title>. <source>Journ. Porcine Research</source>, <volume> 54</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>-<lpage>232. https://hal.inrae.fr/hal</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref23">
                <label>23</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Gräber</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hansen</surname>
                        <given-names>J.F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Olesen</surname>
                        <given-names>S.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Petersen</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Østergaard</surname>
                        <given-names>H.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Krogh</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Accumulation of copper and zinc in Danish agricultural soils in intensive pig production areas</article-title>. <source>Dan. J. Geogr. 105</source>, <fpage>15</fpage>-<lpage>22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2005.10649536</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref24">
                <label>24</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>GIS Sol</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2001</year>. <article-title>The risk of copper deficiency in a demanding crop, https://www</article-title>. <source>gissol.fr/donnees/cartes/le-risque-de-carence-en-cuivre-pour-une-culture-exigeante-1915</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref25">
                <label>25</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hahn</surname>
                        <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Baker</surname>
                        <given-names>D.H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1993</year>. <article-title>Growth and plasma zinc responses of young pigs fed pharmacologic levels of zinc</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. 71-3024. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71113020x</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref26">
                <label>26</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>He</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Li</surname>
                        <given-names>W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Liang</surname>
                        <given-names>X.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wu</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tian</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2009</year>. <article-title>Effect of composting process on phytotoxicity and speciation of copper, zinc and lead in sewage sludge and swine manure</article-title>. <source>Waste Manage</source>, <volume> 29</volume>, <fpage>590</fpage>-<lpage>597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.005</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref27">
                <label>27</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hernández</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pluske</surname>
                        <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>D'Souza</surname>
                        <given-names>D.N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mullan</surname>
                        <given-names>B.P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Levels of copper and zinc in diets for growing and finishing pigs can be reduced without detrimental effects on production and mineral status</article-title>. <source>Animal</source>, <fpage>2</fpage>-<lpage>1771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003182</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref28">
                <label>28</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hill</surname>
                        <given-names>G.M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mahan</surname>
                        <given-names>D.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Carter</surname>
                        <given-names>S.D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cromwell</surname>
                        <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ewan</surname>
                        <given-names>R.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Harrold</surname>
                        <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lewis</surname>
                        <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Miller</surname>
                        <given-names>P.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Shurson</surname>
                        <given-names>G.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Veum</surname>
                        <given-names>T.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Effect of pharmacological concentrations of zinc oxide with or without the inclusion of an antibacterial agent on nursery pig performance</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. 79</source>, <fpage>934</fpage>-<lpage>941. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.794934x</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref29">
                <label>29</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hodges</surname>
                        <given-names>R.T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fraser</surname>
                        <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1983</year>. <article-title>Some observations on the liver copper status of pigs in the northern part of New Zealand</article-title>. <source>New Zeal. Vet. J.</source>, <volume> 31</volume>, <fpage>96</fpage>-<lpage>100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1983.34979</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref30">
                <label>30</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hsu</surname>
                        <given-names>J.H</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lo</surname>
                        <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Effect of composting on characterization and leaching of copper, manganese, and zinc from swine manure</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut. 114</source>, <fpage>119</fpage>-<lpage>127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref31">
                <label>31</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>INRA-AFZ</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d'élevage</article-title>. <source>Sauvant D.</source>, <volume> Perez J.M.</volume>, <fpage>301p</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref32">
                <label>32</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jensen</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kyvsgaard</surname>
                        <given-names>N.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Battisti</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Baptiste</surname>
                        <given-names>K.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Environmental and public health related risk of veterinary zinc in pig production - Using Denmark as an example</article-title>. <source>Env Int</source>, <volume> 114</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>-<lpage>190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.007</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref33">
                <label>33</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jondreville</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Revy</surname>
                        <given-names>P.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jaffrezic</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad</surname>
                        <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2002</year>. <article-title>Copper in pig feed: essential trace element, growth factor and potential risk for humans and the environment</article-title>. <source>INRA Prod. Anim</source>, <volume> 15</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>-<lpage>265. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref34">
                <label>34</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jongbloed</surname>
                        <given-names>A.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Comparison of copper and zinc sources in pig diets</article-title>. <source>Livestock research Wageningen</source>, <volume> Internal report 201005</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref35">
                <label>35</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kickinger</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Würzner</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Windisch</surname>
                        <given-names>W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2009</year>. <article-title>Zinc and copper in feeds, slurry and soils from Austrian pig fattening farms feeding commercial complete feed or feed mixtures produced on-farm</article-title>. <source>Die Bodenkultur</source>, <volume> 60</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>-<lpage>56</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref36">
                <label>36</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kirchgessner</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1993</year>. <article-title>Homeostasis and homeorhesis in trace element metabolism</article-title>. <source>In: Anke M.</source>, <issn> Meissner D.</issn>, <volume> Mills C.F. (Eds). Trace Elements in Man and Animals. TEMA 8</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>-<lpage>21</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref37">
                <label>37</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kuligowski</surname>
                        <given-names>K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Poulsen</surname>
                        <given-names>T.G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Stoholm</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pind</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Laursen</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Nutrients and heavy metals distribution in thermally treated pig manure</article-title>. <source>Waste Manage. Res.</source>, <volume> 26</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>-<lpage>354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X08090075</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref38">
                <label>38</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kumar</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pandita</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Singh Sidhu</surname>
                        <given-names>G.P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Sharma</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Khanna</surname>
                        <given-names>K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kaur</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bali</surname>
                        <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Setia</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source>, <volume> 262 (127810)</volume>, <fpage>24p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127810</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref39">
                <label>39</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Legros</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Multi-scale evaluation of the environmental impact of pig manure spreading on a tropical soil (Reunion Island), speciation and modelling of copper and zinc behaviour</article-title>. <source>PhD thesis</source>, <volume> 236p</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref40">
                <label>40</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Legros</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Doelsch</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Feder</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Moussard</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Sansoulet</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gaudet</surname>
                        <given-names>J.P</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Rigaud</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Basile Doelsch</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Saint Macary</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bottero</surname>
                        <given-names>J.-Y</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Fate and behaviour of Cu and Zn from pig slurry spreading in a tropical water-soil-plant system</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164</source>, <fpage>70</fpage>-<lpage>79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.008</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref41">
                <label>41</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Legros</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Levard</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Marcato-Romain</surname>
                        <given-names>C.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guiresse</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Doelsch</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Anaerobic digestion alters copper and zinc speciation</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol. 516-10334. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01662</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref42">
                <label>42</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Levasseur</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1998</year>. <article-title>Composition of pig manure, variation factors and evaluation methods</article-title>. <source>TechniPorc</source>, <volume> 21</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>-<lpage>25</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref43">
                <label>43</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Levasseur</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2003</year>. <article-title>Material balance of a biological treatment plant by activated sludge with or without head phase separation</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 35</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>-<lpage>40. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref44">
                <label>44</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Levasseur</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Texier</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Metal trace element contents in feed and slurry of fattening pigs, sows and piglets</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 33</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>-<lpage>62</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref45">
                <label>45</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L'Herroux</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Leroux</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Appriou</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martinez</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1997</year>. <article-title>Behaviour of metals following intensive pig slurry applications to a natural field treatment process in Brittany (France)</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut. 97</source>, <fpage>119</fpage>-<lpage>130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref46">
                <label>46</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Li</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Meng</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lixin</surname>
                        <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhou</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Shen</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>X.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ding</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cheng</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wang</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Study of the morphological changes of copper and zinc during pig manure composting with addition of biochar and a microbial agent</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol. 291 (121752)</source>, <volume> 8p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121752</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref47">
                <label>47</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Likiliki</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Convers</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Béline</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Dataset on the characteristics of the liquid effluent issued from separation of faeces and urine under slats using V-shaped scraper in swine buildings</article-title>. <source>Data in Brief</source>, <volume> 30 (105530)</volume>, <fpage>7p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105533</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref48">
                <label>48</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Liu</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Xiong</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Chen</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>He</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lin</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Xue</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Li</surname>
                        <given-names>W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Yu</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Effects of replacing of inorganic trace minerals by organically bound trace minerals on growth performance, tissue mineral status, and fecal mineral excretion in commercial Grower-Finisher pigs</article-title>. <source>Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 173</source>, <fpage>316</fpage>-<lpage>324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref49">
                <label>49</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>López Alonso</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Benedito</surname>
                        <given-names>J.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Miranda</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Castillo</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hernández</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Shore</surname>
                        <given-names>R.F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2000</year>. <article-title>The effect of pig farming on copper and zinc accumulation in Cattle in Galicia (North-Western Spain)</article-title>. <source>Vet. J.</source>, <volume> 160</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>-<lpage>266. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0503</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref50">
                <label>50</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Loussouarn</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lagadec</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Robin</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hassouna</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>V" scraping: environmental and zootechnical assessment during seven years of operation in Guernévez</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 46</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>-<lpage>204</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref51">
                <label>51</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Loyon</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Overview of manure treatment in France</article-title>. <source>Waste Manage</source>, <volume> 61</volume>, <fpage>516</fpage>-<lpage>520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.040</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref52">
                <label>52</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Mallmann</surname>
                        <given-names>F.J.K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>dos Santos Rheinheimer</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ceretta</surname>
                        <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cella</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gomes Minella</surname>
                        <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guma</surname>
                        <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Filipović</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>van Oort</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Šimůnek</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Soil tillage to reduce surface metal contamination - model development and simulations of zinc and copper concentration profiles in a pig slurry-amended soil</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 196</source>, <fpage>59</fpage>-<lpage>68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.024</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref53">
                <label>53</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Männer</surname>
                        <given-names>K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Bioavailability of trace minerals sources in swine</article-title>. <source>In: Schlegel P.</source>, <volume> Durosoy S.</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>-<lpage>186</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref54">
                <label>54</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Marcato</surname>
                        <given-names>C.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2007</year>. <article-title>Origin, fate and impact of copper and zinc in pig manure</article-title>. <source>Role of anaerobic digestion. PhD thesis</source>, <volume> 184p</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref55">
                <label>55</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Marcato</surname>
                        <given-names>C.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pinelli</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pinelli</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cecchi</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Winterton</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guiresse</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2009</year>. <article-title>Bioavailability of Cu and Zn in raw and anaerobically digested pig slurry</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 72-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.12.010</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref56">
                <label>56</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Marszałek</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kowalski</surname>
                        <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Makara</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2019</year>. <article-title>The possibility of contamination of water-soil environment as a result of the use of pig slurry</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Chem. Eng. Sci. 26</source>, <fpage>313</fpage>-<lpage>330. https://doi.org/10.1515/eces</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref57">
                <label>57</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Matheri</surname>
                        <given-names>A.N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Belaid</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Seodigeng</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ngila</surname>
                        <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>The role of trace elements on anaerobic co-digestion in biogas production</article-title>. <source>Proceedings of the world congress on engineering Vol II WCE 2016</source>, <fpage>U.K</fpage>-<lpage> July 1</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref58">
                <label>58</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>McGrath</surname>
                        <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1981</year>. <article-title>Implications of applying copper rich pig slurry to grassland; effects on plant and soil</article-title>. <source>In: L'Hermite P.</source>, <volume> Dehandtschutter J. (Eds). Copper in animal wastes and sewage sludge. Proc. EEC Workshop</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>-<lpage>153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref59">
                <label>59</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>McGrath</surname>
                        <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Chaudri</surname>
                        <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Giller</surname>
                        <given-names>K.E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1995</year>. <article-title>Long term effects of metals in sewage sludge on soils, microorganisms and plants</article-title>. <source>J. Ind. Microbiol</source>, <volume> 14</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>-<lpage>104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569890</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref60">
                <label>60</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>McGrath</surname>
                        <given-names>S.P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhao</surname>
                        <given-names>F.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dunham</surname>
                        <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Crosland</surname>
                        <given-names>A.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Coleman</surname>
                        <given-names>K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2000</year>. <article-title>Long-term changes in the extractability and bioavailaability of zinc and cadmium after sludge application</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual. 29</source>, <fpage>875</fpage>-<lpage>883. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900030025x</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref61">
                <label>61</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Møller</surname>
                        <given-names>H.B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jensen</surname>
                        <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tobiasen</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hansen</surname>
                        <given-names>M.N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2007</year>. <article-title>Heavy metal and phosphorus content of fractions from manure treatment and incineration</article-title>. <source>Environ. Technol. 28-1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332808618900</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref62">
                <label>62</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>National Research Council</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Nutrient Requirement of Swine</article-title>. <source>The National Academies Press</source>, <volume> Washington D.C.</volume>, <fpage>389p</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref63">
                <label>63</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Nicholson</surname>
                        <given-names>F.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Chambers</surname>
                        <given-names>B.J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Livestock manure management and treatment: implications for heavy metal inputs to agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>In: P. Schlegel</source>, <volume> S. Durosoy</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>-<lpage>62. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref64">
                <label>64</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Oberleas</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1973</year>. <article-title>Phytates</article-title>. <source>In: Toxicants occurring naturally in foods. 2nd Ed. National Academies Press</source>, <volume> Washington DC</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>-<lpage>371. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref65">
                <label>65</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>O′Dell</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1989</year>. <article-title>Mineral Interactions Relevant to Nutrient Requirements</article-title>. <source>J. Nutr.-1838. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/119.suppl_12.1832</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref66">
                <label>66</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Paboeuf</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Calvar</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Landrain</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Roy</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2001</year>. <article-title>Impact of reduced dietary levels of total nitrogen, phosphorus, copper and zinc on the performance and rejections of pigs</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 33</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>-<lpage>56. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref67">
                <label>67</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Pantelopoulos</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Aronsson</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Two-stage separation and acidification of pig slurry - Nutrient separation efficiency and agronomical implications</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source>, <volume> 280 (111653)</volume>, <fpage>8p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111653</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref68">
                <label>68</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Popovic</surname>
                        <given-names>O.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jensen</surname>
                        <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Storage temperature affects distribution of carbon, VFA, ammonia, phosphorus, copper and zinc in raw pig slurry and its separated liquid fraction</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source>, <fpage>46</fpage>-<lpage>3858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.020</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref69">
                <label>69</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Popovic</surname>
                        <given-names>O.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hjorth</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jensen</surname>
                        <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Phosphorus, copper and zinc in solid and liquid fractions from full-scale and laboratory-separated pig slurry</article-title>. <source>Environ. Technol. 33-2131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.660649</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref70">
                <label>70</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Poulsen</surname>
                        <given-names>H.D</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1998</year>. <article-title>Zinc and copper as feed additives, growth factors or unwanted environmental factors</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Feed Sci. 7</source>, <fpage>135</fpage>-<lpage>142. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69961/1998</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref76">
                <label>76</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Revy</surname>
                        <given-names>P.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2003</year>. <article-title>Reduction of zinc releases in pigs: estimation of needs and ways to improve availability</article-title>. <source>PhD thesis</source>, <volume> 147p</volume>, <fpage>Agrocampus Ouest</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref77">
                <label>77</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Revy</surname>
                        <given-names>P.S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jondreville</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dourmad J.Y. Nys</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Assessment of dietary zinc requirement of weaned piglets fed diets with or without microbial phytase</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 90</source>, <fpage>50</fpage>-<lpage>59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref78">
                <label>78</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>RMT</surname>
                        <given-names>Élevage</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Environnement</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Evaluation of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, copper and zinc discharges from pigs</article-title>. <source>Paris</source>, <volume> France</volume>, <fpage>26p</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref79">
                <label>79</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Romeo</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Durosoy</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>van Baal</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bikker</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Effect of two copper sources on performance and copper status of weanlings</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 50</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>-<lpage>136</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref80">
                <label>80</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Santos</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fangueiro</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Moral</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pilar Bernal</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Composts produced from pig slurry solids: Nutrient efficiency and N-leaching risks in amended soils</article-title>. <source>Front. Sustainable Food System</source>, <volume> 2</volume>, <fpage>12p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00008</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref81">
                <label>81</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Schlegel</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Factors of variation in the bioavailability of zinc, added in organic or inorganic form, in two growing monogastric species (chicken and piglet)</article-title>. <source>PhD thesis</source>, <volume> 177p</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref82">
                <label>82</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Schlegel</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jondreville</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2011</year>. <article-title>Phytate-zinc interactions in piglets</article-title>. <source>Journ. Rech. Porcine</source>, <volume> 43</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>-<lpage>98</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref83">
                <label>83</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Spears</surname>
                        <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hansen</surname>
                        <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Bioavailability criteria for trace minerals in monogastrics and ruminants</article-title>. <source>In: Schlegel P.</source>, <volume> Durosoy S.</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>-<lpage>175. </lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref84">
                <label>84</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Suttle</surname>
                        <given-names>N.F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Mineral nutrition of livestock</article-title>. <source>4th Edition. Cabi</source>, <volume> Oxfordshire</volume>, <fpage>579p. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934729.0000</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref85">
                <label>85</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Swinkels</surname>
                        <given-names>J.W.G.M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kornegay</surname>
                        <given-names>E.T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Verstegen</surname>
                        <given-names>M.W.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1994</year>. <article-title>Biology of zinc and biological value of dietary organic zinc complexes and chelates</article-title>. <source>Nutr. Res. Rev.</source>, <volume> 7</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>-<lpage>149. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19940009</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref86">
                <label>86</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Van Heugten</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>O'Quinn</surname>
                        <given-names>P.R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Funderburke</surname>
                        <given-names>D.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Flowers</surname>
                        <given-names>W.L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Spears</surname>
                        <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Growth performance, carcass characteristics, plasma minerals, and fecal mineral excretion in grower finisher swine fed diets with levels of trace minerals lower than common industry levels</article-title>. <source>J. Swine Health Prod</source>, <volume> 12</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>-<lpage>241</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref87">
                <label>87</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Villagómez-Estrada</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pérez</surname>
                        <given-names>J.F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Darwich</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vidal</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>van Kuijk</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Melo-Durán</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Solà-Oriol</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Effects of copper and zinc sources and inclusion levels of copper on weanling pig performance and intestinal microbiota</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. 98</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa117</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref88">
                <label>88</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Villagómez-Estrada</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pérez</surname>
                        <given-names>J.F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>van Kuijk</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Melo-Durán</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Karimirad</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Solà-Oriol</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Effects of two zinc supplementation levels and two zinc and copper sources with different solubility characteristics on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and digestibility of growing-finishing pigs</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 105</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13447</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref89">
                <label>89</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Yang</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wen</surname>
                        <given-names>Q.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Chen</surname>
                        <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Impacts of Cu and Zn on the performance, microbial community dynamics and resistance genes variations during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol. 312</source>, <volume> 11p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123554</volume>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref90">
                <label>90</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hua</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Deng</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Nutrient status and contamination risks from digested pig slurry applied on a vegetable crops field</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source>, <volume> 13 (406)</volume>, <fpage>11p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040406</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref91">
                <label>91</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>GOURLEZ</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>BÉLINE</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>DOURMAD</surname>
                        <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>MONTEIRO</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>DE QUELEN</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Role and environmental impacts of copper and zinc in pig farming: from feed to agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>INRAE Prod. Anim. 35</source>, <fpage>91e</fpage>-<lpage>108e</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
        <fn-group>
            <fn id="fn1">
                <label>1</label>
                <p> This article is adapted from the paper presented at the Journées de la Recherche Porcine in 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Gourlez <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>).</p>
            </fn>
        </fn-group>
    </back>
</article>
